2019
DOI: 10.5565/rev/analisi.3234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estudi comparat de les posicions a Twitter dels polítics espanyols sobre el feminisme

Abstract: This research analyses feminism-related tweets produced over a period of two months by both a male representative and a female representative of each of the four principal political parties in Spain (PP, PSOE, Ciudadanos and Podemos). Although their behaviour on Twitter is similar, the differences found are more marked by ideology than by gender. A content analysis shows that the parties tend to reinforce their ideological programme on Twitter, which is corroborated as a space for disseminating topics related … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the topics mostly addressed by influencers match the main gender perspective topics in traditional media agenda: issues related to sexist violence (Casero-Ripollés, 2010). This fact also has been pointed out by Fernández-Rovira & Villegas-Simón (2019), who highlight the relationship between Twitter and the media agenda, since most tweets with gender perspective published by Spanish politicians are related to news events and feminicides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…On the other hand, the topics mostly addressed by influencers match the main gender perspective topics in traditional media agenda: issues related to sexist violence (Casero-Ripollés, 2010). This fact also has been pointed out by Fernández-Rovira & Villegas-Simón (2019), who highlight the relationship between Twitter and the media agenda, since most tweets with gender perspective published by Spanish politicians are related to news events and feminicides.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%