Estructura factorial de las Escalas de Bienestar Psicológico de Ryff en estudiantes universitarios

Rodríguez, Carlos Freire; MarFerradás, María del Mar; Núñez, José Carlos; Valle, António

doi:10.30552/ejep.v10i1.126

Cited by 6 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The divergences might stem from several factors; for example, it may depend on how the different samples (undergraduates, adults, older adults) understand the construct of PWB; on the number of items conforming each dimension of the scale; or on method effects (Tomas, Meléndez, Oliver, Navarro & Zaragoza, 2010). These measurement inconsistencies have been reported in other studies (e.g., Burns & Machin, 2009; Kafka, Kozma & Kafka, 2014; Triadó, Villar, Solé & Celdrán, 2007), so it is common to observe that the Ryff's six‐factor model does not provide acceptable fit indices (Abbott, Ploubidis, Huppert, Kuh & Croudace, 2010; Díaz, Rodríguez‐Carvajal, Blanco et al ., 2006; Freire, Ferradás & Valle, 2017; Springer et al ., 2006). A three‐factor structure whereby self‐acceptance, life purpose, personal growth and environmental mastery are combined to form a single dimension has been reported to explain the structure of psychological well‐being (Abbott et al ., 2010; Burns & Machin, 2009; Kafka et al ., 2014), which resembles the self‐determination theory of Ryan and Deci (2000).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A three‐factor structure whereby self‐acceptance, life purpose, personal growth and environmental mastery are combined to form a single dimension has been reported to explain the structure of psychological well‐being (Abbott et al ., 2010; Burns & Machin, 2009; Kafka et al ., 2014), which resembles the self‐determination theory of Ryan and Deci (2000). A four‐factor model was found using the 29‐item version of the PWBS (as in this study) composed of self‐acceptance, environmental mastery, personal growth and life purpose, but the authors excluded the dimensions of positive relationships and autonomy (Freire et al ., 2017). Other studies have supported the theoretical six‐factor (Clarke, Marshall, Ryff & Wheaton, 2001; Díaz et al ., 2006; Ryff & Keyes, 1995) or six‐bifactor structure (Espinoza, Meyer, Anderson, Vaters & Politis, 2018).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The architecture of psychological well‐being: A network analysis study of the Ryff Psychological Well‐Being Scale

Blasco‐Belled

Mora

2022

Scandinavian J Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The proliferation of mental health research is orienting its efforts towards the exploration of psychological well‐being. One of the main burdens is the measurement challenges reported by the widely used Psychological Well‐Being Scale (PWBS), which has often been criticized for inconsistencies between the theoretical and the empirical model. A potential alternative to understand the structure of psychological well‐being is network models, which conceptualizes psychological phenomena as emerging systems of mutually connected variables. Employing exploratory graph analysis, we examined the network structure of the Spanish 29‐item PWBS in a random sample of 1,404 adults. We estimated a regularized partial correlation network using the graphical LASSO algorithm in the item and dimension level. We tested the stability of both networks and identified the most important variables of the network. The PWBS network model revealed four dimensions, with self‐acceptance, life purpose and environmental mastery clustering together. Node strength centrality suggested that self‐acceptance is the most central dimension in the psychological well‐being structure as measured by the PWBS. Despite the network model of psychological well‐being did not replicate the theoretical structure of Ryff's model, it provides a novel conceptualization of psychological well‐being and proposes target indicators for mental health interventions.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The architecture of psychological well‐being: A network analysis study of the Ryff Psychological Well‐Being Scale

Blasco‐Belled

Mora

2022

Scandinavian J Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Psychological well-being is currently regarded as a construct which lacks a well-defined theoretical structure (González Barrón et al, 2002 ; Freire et al, 2017 ; Carneiro et al, 2019 ). However, the concept can be directly associated with how individuals assess their quality of life, and whether they give it a positive and favorable evaluation from a systemic and holistic perspective.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of the Relationship Between Psychological Well-Being and Decision Making in Adolescent Students

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Adolescents are frequently faced with situations in which they have to make decisions by choosing from a range of possible alternatives. In such circumstances, individual, social, and environmental conditions have an impact on the choice of the final decision in light of the various options presented. The main objective of this study is to analyze the relationship between the psychological well-being of adolescent students and their decision-making style. The research method used corresponds to an ex post facto, quantitative, transversal, correlational, and descriptive design, with an initial sample of 1,262 students from the Autonomous Community of Madrid, Spain, aged 13-19. A subsequent resampling of 385 participants was extracted from the initial sample by proportional allocation to strata (according to the levels of the variables gender, academic year, and educational institution classification) to guarantee the representativeness of the population data. Data collection uses the first Spanish adaptation of Ryff's Psychological well-being Scale and the Flinders Adolescent Decision Making Questionnaire, adapted by Friedman and Mann. The data shows that greater use of adaptive decision-making strategies correlates significantly with greater psychological well-being. In contrast, the correlation is high and negative at the intersection of the maladaptive decision-making variables and psychological well-being.

show abstract

“…Estudiamos el bienestar psicológico desde la tradición eudaimónica (Freire, Ferradás, Núñez & Valle, 2017), que implica el desarrollo de capacidades personales, asociado al ajuste y funcionamiento saludable del sujeto (Pineda, Castro, y Chaparro, 2018). En este sentido, nos situamos en la búsqueda personal de excelencia, no solo desde la emoción de la alegría, sino que también desde una concepción normativa que tiene la persona de sí misma, formada por la autoconciencia, autoestima y autoeficacia (Oramas, Santana y Vergara, 2007).…”

Section: Bienestar Psicológicounclassified

Bienestar psicológico y social de funcionarios de centro de salud pública y su relación con personalidad y eficacia colectiva

Carreño

srepel²,

Campos³

2021

Psicogente

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introducción: Los funcionarios de Salud Pública presentan el mayor número de patologías mentalesasociadas a la esfera laboral, tornando urgente el adoptar medidas para prevenir los riesgos psicosociales y favorecer su bienestar psicológico y social. Objetivo: Establecer los rasgos de personalidad y categorías de eficacia colectiva que se relacionan con el bienestar psicológico y social de funcionarios de un centro de salud pública. Método: Estudio transeccional correlacional, con uso de metodología cuantitativa. Muestra no probabilística conformada por 51 participantes, entre 20 y 63 años; 30 % hombres, 70% mujeres, 62,75 % profesionales, 25,5% técnicos y 11,76 % otros. Resultados: Se encuentra una correlaciónpositiva entre Apertura a la experiencia y Autoaceptación (rho = 0.391), al igual que entre Amabilidad y Propósito en la vida (rho =0.360). La misma tendencia se devela entre Competencias Grupales Positivas y Pertenencia Social (rho = 0.471) e Interacción Social en el trabajo (rho = 0.413). Al igual que entre Elementos Positivos influyentes en las tareas y Pertenencia Social en el trabajo (rho=0.395). Conclusiones: Los rasgos de personalidad establecidos por John, Donahue & Kentle (1991) de Aperturaa la experiencia y Amabilidad, en conjunto con las dimensiones de eficacia colectiva de Competencias grupales positivas y Análisis de elementos positivos influyentes en las tareas, se relacionan positivamentecon el bienestar psicológico y social en el trabajo, en funcionarios de salud pública.

show abstract

Estructura factorial de las Escalas de Bienestar Psicológico de Ryff en estudiantes universitarios

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

The architecture of psychological well‐being: A network analysis study of the Ryff Psychological Well‐Being Scale

The architecture of psychological well‐being: A network analysis study of the Ryff Psychological Well‐Being Scale

Analysis of the Relationship Between Psychological Well-Being and Decision Making in Adolescent Students

Bienestar psicológico y social de funcionarios de centro de salud pública y su relación con personalidad y eficacia colectiva

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About