2010
DOI: 10.1016/s1002-0160(10)60035-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of the van Genuchten Soil Water Retention Properties from Soil Textural Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The values of FC and PWP is found at pressures between 0.3 and 15 bar, according to the methodology described by PIRES et al (2005).The curves found have typical behavior of loam soil in accordance with studies from GHANBARIAN-ALAVIJEH et al (2010).The values of field capacity range from 0.32 to 0.55 cm 3 cm -3 , which is higher on the P2 surface. These values agree with the above by MEZA & GEISSERT (2003) for andic soils.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The values of FC and PWP is found at pressures between 0.3 and 15 bar, according to the methodology described by PIRES et al (2005).The curves found have typical behavior of loam soil in accordance with studies from GHANBARIAN-ALAVIJEH et al (2010).The values of field capacity range from 0.32 to 0.55 cm 3 cm -3 , which is higher on the P2 surface. These values agree with the above by MEZA & GEISSERT (2003) for andic soils.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…While some mixing of soil horizons can occur during upland forest site preparation that includes piling (Gent et al, 1984;Hoadley, 2014), the influence on particle size distribution within the profile is small compared to the influence on macroporosity. When macropores are created by tillage, the soil water release curve (soil water content plotted against soil water potential) is shifted, but the curve shape is largely retained since particle size distribution, which largely controls the shape of the water retention curve (Ghanbarian-Alavijeh et al, 2010;Zhuang et al, 2001), is not greatly affected. In this study, water availability on a unit volume basis was reduced, but improved rooting conditions that apparently increased root penetration and the volume of soil utilized compensated for the lower availability on a unit volume basis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…É importante destacar que o conhecimento da magnitude da variabilidade espacial dos parâmetros estudados é essencial para utilização em modelos de simulação de fluxo de água em solos e de predição das relações e do comportamento do sistema solo-planta-atmosfera, uma vez que tais modelos utilizam tais parâmetros como dados de entrada (GHANBARIAN-ALAVIJEH et al, 2010;DETTMANN et al, 2014).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified