2002
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.2002.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation of Genetic, Phenotypic and Environmental Trends in Hariana Cattle

Abstract: The breeding data relating to Hariana herd spread over 18 years were analysed to estimate genetic, phenotypic and environmental changes in characters of economic importance which might have taken place during the several years of selective breeding practiced in the herd. The average genetic changes in a given character were estimated by four methods. The phenotypic trends observed for different economic traits were not significant. On changing the method of estimation, magnitude and direction of genetic trend… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results displayed in Table 2 show that calving season had statistically significant effect on the yield of milk and milk proteins (p<0.05) and statistically very significant effect on the yield of milk fat (p<0.01). The results obtained are consistent with a number of studies (Lukač et al, 2014;Stanojević et al, 2012b;Singh et. al., 2001;Gaydarska et al, 2001) in which a significant effect of calving season on the yield of milk, milk fat and protein was determined.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results displayed in Table 2 show that calving season had statistically significant effect on the yield of milk and milk proteins (p<0.05) and statistically very significant effect on the yield of milk fat (p<0.01). The results obtained are consistent with a number of studies (Lukač et al, 2014;Stanojević et al, 2012b;Singh et. al., 2001;Gaydarska et al, 2001) in which a significant effect of calving season on the yield of milk, milk fat and protein was determined.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Heritability estimate was slightly higher for the definition in which each lactation was restricted to 305-days and may be favoured for use in future. Heritability estimates in the present study was similar to earlier estimates of 0.17±0.07 by Dutt and Taneja (1994) and in cattle (0.18±0.16) by Singh et al (2002). Lower h 2 estimates (0.03 to 0.08) have been reported in cattle using the paternal halfsib correlation and Animal Model (VanRandan and Klaaskate, 1993;Vollema and Groen, 1996;Weigel et al, 1997;Vollema et al, 2000).…”
Section: Productive Lifesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The annual genetic change in interval traits were positive (0.07+0.02 and 0.24+0.04 for CFS and DO, respectively) indicating that more attention should be given to reproductive traits to avoid losses related to these traits in the future. As the trait is mainly governed by non-genetic factors, managemental practices should be improved for lowering the interval traits (Singh et al, 2002). Atil and Khattab (2005) found that genetic trend for 305 d milk yield to be 44.85 kg/yr and concluded that selection objective focused on choosing the best sires and cows to be the next generation parents would lead to increase in milk traits and decrease in reproductive traits simultaneously.…”
Section: Genetic and Phenotypic Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%