2017 18th International Radar Symposium (IRS) 2017
DOI: 10.23919/irs.2017.8008126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimation and cancellation of interferences in automotive radar signals

Abstract: Radar sensors become typical components for automotive driver assistance systems and autonomous driving. The widespread use of this sensor type leads to an increasing risk of unwanted interferences. Those interferences can severely degrade the detection performance and cause sensor blindness. To overcome this problem, this paper describes a method to estimate and remove interfering signals in data of chirp sequence modulated radars. The estimation is derived theoretically and applied on simulation and measurem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as stated by the authors, the accuracy of the proposed techniques in Bechter and Waldschmidt [27] and Bechter et al. [28] requires high calculation efforts and largely depends on the interference amplitude and the number of interfered samples: the higher the amplitude and the larger number of samples affected by interference, the better the accuracy of interference parameter estimation is. Here, an extra signal processing chain in the receiver with wideband LPF2 and STFT is proposed at the output of the mixer to analyse the spectrogram across the entire spectrum to extract a different set of interference parameters such as the start frequency, bandwidth, sweep time, chirp rate and idle time.…”
Section: Interference Analysis In Various Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as stated by the authors, the accuracy of the proposed techniques in Bechter and Waldschmidt [27] and Bechter et al. [28] requires high calculation efforts and largely depends on the interference amplitude and the number of interfered samples: the higher the amplitude and the larger number of samples affected by interference, the better the accuracy of interference parameter estimation is. Here, an extra signal processing chain in the receiver with wideband LPF2 and STFT is proposed at the output of the mixer to analyse the spectrogram across the entire spectrum to extract a different set of interference parameters such as the start frequency, bandwidth, sweep time, chirp rate and idle time.…”
Section: Interference Analysis In Various Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, zeroing requires a robust detection and raises additional frequency components; these artifacts can be reduced by introducing a window function at the time domain discontinuities [78] or a prediction of the missing data with autoregressive models [81]. It is also possible to estimate and afterwards cancel the interference component [82] from the time signals. This does not suppress the interference completely, but it does not introduce artifacts in the spectrum.…”
Section: Time-domain Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various signal processing techniques have been proposed to address the problem of mutual interference [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] in the frequency-modulated continuous wave (FMCW) radar or the chirp sequence (CS) radar [15]. Besides the traditional signal processing approaches, recent research results have shown that deep learning approaches can be used to solve this problem [16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%