2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2009.01493.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Specular Roughness and Anisotropy from Second Order Spherical Gradient Illumination

Abstract: This paper presents a novel method for estimating specular roughness and tangent vectors, per surface point, from polarized second order spherical gradient illumination patterns. We demonstrate that for isotropic BRDFs, only three second order spherical gradients are sufficient to robustly estimate spatially varying specular roughness. For anisotropic BRDFs, an additional two measurements yield specular roughness and tangent vectors per surface point. We verify our approach with different illumination configur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(33 reference statements)
1
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We also note that while the Brewster angle can vary over large surfaces, we only found a 5 − 6 • variations over our largest sample (canvas print/~0.75 m wide), which is still within the acceptable range as per Figure 11. Figure 12 presents a comparison between reflectance maps of the red book cover acquired with our approach under uncontrolled outdoor illumination (Figure 7) and those acquired with controlled LCD panel illumination using the approach of [Ghosh et al 2009]. Overall, the maps acquired with our proposed approach are qualitatively very similar to those obtained with controlled measurements.…”
Section: Discussion and Error Analysissupporting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We also note that while the Brewster angle can vary over large surfaces, we only found a 5 − 6 • variations over our largest sample (canvas print/~0.75 m wide), which is still within the acceptable range as per Figure 11. Figure 12 presents a comparison between reflectance maps of the red book cover acquired with our approach under uncontrolled outdoor illumination (Figure 7) and those acquired with controlled LCD panel illumination using the approach of [Ghosh et al 2009]. Overall, the maps acquired with our proposed approach are qualitatively very similar to those obtained with controlled measurements.…”
Section: Discussion and Error Analysissupporting
confidence: 61%
“…12. Comparison between the reflectance and normal maps of red book estimated with our proposed approach (top row) vs. those obtain with controlled measurements using an LCD panel [Ghosh et al 2009] (center row). Error is visualized in false color (bottom row).…”
Section: Discussion and Error Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As we focus on increasing the wide applicabily rather than improving the quality of recent BRDF methods, an approximate glossiness acquisition suffices for our purposes. The most closely related approach was presented by Ghosh et al [30]. They estimate roughness as well as anisotropy from second order spherical gradient illumination.…”
Section: Reflectancementioning
confidence: 99%