2017
DOI: 10.1145/3130800.3130894
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Polarization imaging reflectometry in the wild

Abstract: We present a novel approach for on-site acquisition of surface reflectance for planar, spatially varying, isotropic samples in uncontrolled outdoor environments. Our method exploits the naturally occurring linear polarization of incident and reflected illumination for this purpose. By rotating a linear polarizing filter in front of a camera at three different orientations, we measure the polarization reflected off the sample and combine this information with multi-view analysis and inverse rendering in order t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of assumptions have been proposed to reduce ambiguity when only a few measurements of the material are available. Common priors include spatial and angular homogeneity [Zickler et al 2006], repetitive or random texture-like behavior [Ai ala et al 2016[Ai ala et al , 2015, sparse environment lighting [Dong et al 2014;Lombardi and Nishino 2016], polarization of sky lighting [Riviere et al 2017], mixture of basis BRDFs [Dong et al 2010;Hui et al 2017;Ren et al 2011], optimal sampling directions [Xu et al 2016], and user-provided constraints [Dong et al 2011]. However, many of these assumptions restrict the family of materials that can be captured.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of assumptions have been proposed to reduce ambiguity when only a few measurements of the material are available. Common priors include spatial and angular homogeneity [Zickler et al 2006], repetitive or random texture-like behavior [Ai ala et al 2016[Ai ala et al , 2015, sparse environment lighting [Dong et al 2014;Lombardi and Nishino 2016], polarization of sky lighting [Riviere et al 2017], mixture of basis BRDFs [Dong et al 2010;Hui et al 2017;Ren et al 2011], optimal sampling directions [Xu et al 2016], and user-provided constraints [Dong et al 2011]. However, many of these assumptions restrict the family of materials that can be captured.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the building cost of such systems is too high to make the acquisition process not available for casual users to have access to this acquisition process. To resolve this issue, practical methods using a single camera have been introduced [AWL15, RPG16, HSL*17, RRFG17, WZ15, WWZ16, SWK19, PNS18, NLGK18]. These methods can capture material appearance by inferring diffuse and specular appearance parameters from multiple observations with different view/light angles.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, we were motivated to devise a practical acquisition solution without requiring any specialized hardware setup, such as a mechanical gantry with two robotic arms or a multiview camera‐light stage. To this end, we decided to make use of a conventional RGBD camera for our acquisition setup, following the trend of state‐of‐the‐art practical techniques [AWL15, RPG16, HSL*17, RRFG17, WZ15, WWZ16, PNS18, NLGK18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specular highlights can be removed by a similar approach [ 16 ], which estimates the polarization angle of the specular highlight by measuring linear Stokes parameters. Recently, Riviere et al [ 17 ] have employed similar linear polarization measurements under uncontrolled outdoor illumination for estimating surface reflectance of planar surfaces. However, these approaches require multiple shots with rotating polarizers at a specific angle in front of an imaging device to measure the Stokes parameters.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%