2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.05.091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating global ecosystem service values and its response to land surface dynamics during 1995–2015

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) data are important inputs for countries to monitor how their soil and land use are being modified over time [1,2]. It is also possible to identify the impacts of increasing urban environments in different ecosystems [3,4,5,6], monitoring protected areas, and the expansion of deforested areas in tropical forests [1,7,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Land Use and Land Cover (LULC) data are important inputs for countries to monitor how their soil and land use are being modified over time [1,2]. It is also possible to identify the impacts of increasing urban environments in different ecosystems [3,4,5,6], monitoring protected areas, and the expansion of deforested areas in tropical forests [1,7,8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the latter purpose, the LULC mapping has been used to enhance the results found for Costanza et al [15] that provided global ES values. In that research, the values have been rectified since its first publication [16,17]; the LULC approach provides land classes which allow to estimate ES by unit area, making it possible to extrapolate ES estimates and values for greater areas and biomes around the world by using the benefit transfer method [1,17,18]. Nonetheless, Song [19] highlights the limitation of these values estimations, since LULC satellite-based products have uncertainties related to the data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new global, spatially explicit ES assessment was required for this study because previous studies have not released the supporting spatial data, calculations, and resulting maps (e.g. Costanza et al 1997, Ghermandi and Nunes, 2013, Costanza et al 2014, Li and Fang 2014, Kubiszewski et al 2017, Sannigrahi et al 2018, Song 2018 The global ES assessment workflow consists of the following steps: (1) inventory the ecosystem subservices and services in ES assessments; (2) homogenize the inventory; (3) reduce the inventory to those ecosystem subservices that are mappable and calculable; (4) preprocess the data; (5) apply spatial disaggregation; and (6) compute total ES values. Table 1 provides detailed information for the ES assessment, including the category, service, and subservices used.…”
Section: Global Es Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the review in 2011, six other studies mapped ES values globally (Ghermandi and Nunes 2013, Costanza et al 2014, Li and Fang, 2014, Kubiszewski et al 2017, Sannigrahi et al 2018, Song 2018, but the outputs were not published preventing incorporation in future or other analyses by the broader scientific community.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, with some exceptions (Chen & Zhang, 2000;Costanza et al, 1997;de Groot et al, 2012;Deloitte Access Economics, 2017;Kubiszewski, Costanza, Anderson, & Sutton, 2017;Sannigrahi, Bhatt, Rahmat, Paul, & Sen, 2018), most ESV focusses on marginal changes in the value of a narrow suite of ES flows, commonly from a single, locally-important habitat (Baskara, Hendarto, & Susilowati, 2017;Matthew et al, 2018;Pascal et al, 2016). In application, these values are typically used in social benefit cost analysis of specific proposals (Georgiou et al, 1997;van der Ploeg & de Groot, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%