2017
DOI: 10.1111/dom.13110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated glucose disposal rate predicts mortality in adults with type 1 diabetes

Abstract: There is a strong association between eGDR and all-cause mortality, as well as cardiovascular mortality, in individuals with T1D. Our findings may guide preventive measures by improving risk assessment in individuals with T1D.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
87
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(73 reference statements)
4
87
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An eGDR <8 was associated with increased cardiovascular risk or death compared to those with eGDR ≥8. The risk further increased with lower eGDR values (Figure ) . Interestingly, the survival rate of individuals with eGDR ≥8 was identical to a matched reference population.…”
Section: Definition Of Ddmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…An eGDR <8 was associated with increased cardiovascular risk or death compared to those with eGDR ≥8. The risk further increased with lower eGDR values (Figure ) . Interestingly, the survival rate of individuals with eGDR ≥8 was identical to a matched reference population.…”
Section: Definition Of Ddmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The eGDR score was originally developed and validated with the euglycaemic‐hyperinsulinemic clamp in a subset of 24 participants with T1D from the Pittsburgh EDC study . The authors of that study initially calculated eGDR using clinical factors including waist–hip ratio (WHR), presence of hypertension and HbA1c; however, they also stated that replacing WHR with either BMI or waist circumference provided a similar association with insulin resistance . Formulae used for eGDR calculation are shown below: eGDRWHR=24.31()12.22×WHR()3.29×HTN()0.57×HbA1normalc0.25em[]% eGDRWC=21.16()0.09×WC()3.41×HTN()0.55×HbA1normalc0.25em[]% eGDRBMI=19.02()0.22×BMI0.25em[]kg/m2()3.26×HTN()0.61×HbA1normalc0.25em[]% where, WC is waist circumference (cm) and HTN is hypertension (1 = yes, 0 = no).…”
Section: Definition Of Ddmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations