2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.dss.2020.113406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Establishing a frame of reference for measuring disaster resilience

Abstract: Due to the increasing occurrence of disruptions across our global society, it has become critically important to understand the resilience of different socio-economic systems, i.e., to what extent those systems exhibit the ability both to resist a disruption and to recover from one once it occurs. In order to characterize this ability, however, one must be able to quantitatively measure the relative level of resilience that a given system displays in response to a disruptive event. Such a measurement should be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This involved stabilization efforts to recover the previous equilibrium, and leads to engineering resilience , which is in line with the existing literature in terms of targeting robustness (de Vries et al. , 2022), resisting disturbance (Zobel et al. , 2021), and bouncing back to normal (Christopher and Peck, 2004).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This involved stabilization efforts to recover the previous equilibrium, and leads to engineering resilience , which is in line with the existing literature in terms of targeting robustness (de Vries et al. , 2022), resisting disturbance (Zobel et al. , 2021), and bouncing back to normal (Christopher and Peck, 2004).…”
Section: Findings and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…This also means stabilizing or maintaining profitability level; thus, fixed pricing and better control/management of the cost base (Case#2,7) are the fundamental pricing policies and practices used to achieve this. This involved stabilization efforts to recover the previous equilibrium, and leads to engineering resilience, which is in line with the existing literature in terms of targeting robustness (de Vries et al, 2022), resisting disturbance (Zobel et al, 2021), and bouncing back to normal (Christopher and Peck, 2004).…”
Section: Developing and Enhancing Resilience Via Stabilizationsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…From an engineering perspective, a common approach for assessing disaster resilience is to look at the physical characteristics of a system and to consider how system loss evolves by studying the extent to which the system is initially damaged and the amount of time needed for it to regain its normal functionality [36,37].…”
Section: Measuring Resiliencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction in PDP indicates that the network is learning. To measure network learning, we borrow the concept of "resilience triangle" (Bruneau et al, 2003;Zobel, 2014;Zobel et al, 2021) and use the area under curve (AUC) of the PDP trajectory. If a network is learning at a faster rate, its PDP drops more quickly over time, resulting in a smaller AUC.…”
Section: Supply Network Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%