2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2004.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ESR investigation of gamma irradiated sulbactam sodium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mathematical equations that show the best fit of the samples and correlation coefficient (R 2 ) are given in Table 2. This comment agree with results obtained for various kind of drugs studied before [16][17]. In these functions, I and D are used for EPR signal intensity and treated irradiation dose in kGy, respectively and other parameters are constants to be determined.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Mathematical equations that show the best fit of the samples and correlation coefficient (R 2 ) are given in Table 2. This comment agree with results obtained for various kind of drugs studied before [16][17]. In these functions, I and D are used for EPR signal intensity and treated irradiation dose in kGy, respectively and other parameters are constants to be determined.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Mathematical equations that show the best fit of the samples and correlation coefficient (R 2 ) are given in Table 2. This comment agrees with results obtained for various kind of drugs studied before [26,27]. In these functions, I and D are used for EPR signal intensity and treated irradiation dose in kGy, respectively and other parameters are constants to be determined.…”
Section: Dose-response Curvessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…However, there is no single ideal method for this selection. Linear, exponential and polynomial functions are frequently used for this purpose [9,[18][19][20]. Several mathematical functions were tried to describe evolution of the central EPR signal with absorbed radiation dose.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%