2014
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1365150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Esophageal perforation during endoscopic removal of food impaction in eosinophilic esophagitis: stent well spent?

Abstract: This document was downloaded for personal use only. Unauthorized distribution is strictly prohibited.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, apart from this problem, the PIED had completely healed. Contrary to van Rhijn et al, 7 we believe that the use of PSEMs is justified even in patients with EoE. We argue that the sealing effect is superior to that of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, apart from this problem, the PIED had completely healed. Contrary to van Rhijn et al, 7 we believe that the use of PSEMs is justified even in patients with EoE. We argue that the sealing effect is superior to that of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 81%
“…So far, van Rhijn et al 7 reported the only successful treatment of an EoE-induced PIED with a PSMES. Stent extraction 3 weeks later was complicated by tissue ingrowth, and a stent-in-stent technique was applied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The reports of esophageal stent in term of technical and clinical success in treatment of iatrogenic perforation were 91% to 100% and 81% to 86% respectively. 46,47 When esophageal mucosa is friable, e.g., post-sclerosing agent injection, 48 or fragile, e.g., eosinophilic esophagitis, 49 stent placement has been reported to be more effective than endoscopic clipping. 48,49 When compared with esophagectomy, esophageal stenting caused lower mortality (13.8% vs 7.3%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%