Background:The frequency of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) occurrence is escalating. Current diagnostic criteria recently proposed for the disease, determine that previous estimates of incidence and prevalence are outdated.Aim: To gauge the current incidence and prevalence of EoE by performing a systematic review of population-based studies.Methods: Three electronic databases were searched from their inception dates to September 2018. A total of 2386 documents were screened; 29 studies reported on the prevalence and incidence of EoE in the general population. Results:The pooled prevalence of EoE was 34.4 cases per 100 000 inhabitants (95% CI, 23.1-47.5), and was higher for adults (42.2; 95% CI, 31.1-55) than for children (34; 95% CI, 22.3-49.2). The pooled EoE incidence rates were 6.6/100 000 person-years (95% CI, 3-11.7) in children and 7.7/100 000 (95% CI, 1.8-17.8) in adults.No differences were found between North American and European studies using varied sources of data (insurance and administrative databases compared to hospital-bases case series). Subgroup analysis according to risk of bias did not change results significantly. A steady rise in EoE incidence and prevalence rates was observed over time, comparing studies conducted under subsequent definitions for EoE. No significant publication bias was found. Conclusions:In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found a sharp increase, higher than previous estimates, in the incidence and prevalence of EoE in population based studies. Results from studies carried out in developed countries show broad consistency and provide evidence of increasing pooled prevalence and incidence of EoE rates over time.Additional supporting information will be found online in the Supporting Information section at the end of the article.How to cite this article: Navarro P, Arias Á, Arias-González L, Laserna-Mendieta EJ, Ruiz-Ponce M, Lucendo AJ. Systematic review with meta-analysis: the growing incidence and prevalence of eosinophilic oesophagitis in children and adults in population-based studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther.
This article has an accompanying continuing medical education activity, also eligible for MOC credit, on page e161. Learning Objective-Upon completion of this activity, successful learners will be able to list the main alternatives for the treatment of patients with eosinophilic esophagitis; list the expected response rates for each of these alternatives; and be able to select effectively the most suitable treatment option for patients with eosinophilic esophagitis based on their clinical characteristics.
Our results show that the metabolic disturbances associated with RA depend on the degree of inflammation and identify inflammation of adipose tissue as the initial target leading to IR and the associated molecular disorders of carbohydrate and lipid homeostasis. Thus, we anticipate that therapeutic strategies based on tighter control of inflammation and flares could provide promising approaches to normalize and/or prevent metabolic alterations associated with RA.
Background Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of adalimumab (ADA) in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) has gained increased attention since several studies showed a correlation between drug levels and mucosal healing. The limitations of routine usage of enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA) kits for measuring serum ADA concentrations have prompted the development of rapid methods, such as Quantum Blue (QB). We evaluated the interchangeability and agreement between the QB method and two established ELISA kits, Promonitor (PM) and Lisa-Tracker (LT). Methods Fifty samples from patients with IBD were included. Quantitative analysis was performed using the ANOVA test for repeated measures, Deming regression and the Bland-Altman plot. Clinical implications were evaluated by concordance in classifying patients into therapeutic windows according to the proposed cut-off levels for subtherapeutic (either <5 or <7.5 μg/mL) and supratherapeutic (>12 μg/mL) ranges. Results Statistical differences were detected between the QB method and the two ELISA kits, with QB overestimating ADA serum values compared to them. A lack of interchangeability was observed between methods, with greater differences as ADA levels increased. An analysis of a sub-set of samples with ADA values below 9 μg/mL (n = 25) showed that QB fulfilled the criteria to be interchangeable with the LT assay. Concordance for patient classification into ADA therapeutic windows was better for QB vs. LT than for QB vs. PM, with high agreement (>75%) for subtherapeutic levels among the three methods. Conclusions Although quantitative differences existed between the rapid method and ELISA kits that hampered their interchangeability, the agreement for identifying patients with subtherapeutic values of ADA was high.
Liver disease is one of the most important causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide whose prevalence is dramatically increasing. The first sign of hepatic damage is inflammation which could be accompanied by the accumulation of fat called non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), causing damage in the hepatocytes. This stage can progress to fibrosis where the accumulation of fibrotic tissue replaces healthy tissue reducing liver function. The next stage is cirrhosis, a late phase of fibrosis where a high percentage of liver tissue has been replaced by fibrotic tissue and liver functionality is substantially impaired. There is a close interplay of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and hepatic alterations, where different mechanisms mediating this relation between the liver and systemic vasculature have been described. In chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), in which the CVD risk is high, hepatic alterations seem to be more prevalent compared to the general population and other rheumatic disorders. The pathogenic mechanisms involved in the development of this comorbidity are still unraveled, although chronic inflammation, autoimmunity, treatments, and metabolic deregulation seem to have an important role. In this review, we will discuss the involvement of liver disease in the cardiovascular risk associated with inflammatory arthritis, the pathogenic mechanisms, and the recognized factors involved. Likewise, monitoring of the liver disease risk in routine clinical practice through both, classical and novel techniques and indexes will be exposed. Finally, we will examine the latest controversies that have been raised about the effects of the current therapies used to control the inflammation in RA and PsA, in the liver damage of those patients, such as methotrexate, leflunomide or biologics.
Objectives1) To evaluate the role of inflammatory mediators and adipokines in the cardiovascular risk profile and the metabolic comorbidities associated with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). 2) To evaluate the effect of apremilast in the adipocytokine pattern, metabolic components and endothelial dysfunction in patients with PsA and metabolic syndrome (MetSyn).Methods55 PsA patients and 30 age and gender-matched healthy donors (HD) were analysed. An extensive clinical analysis including body index mass, lipid profile, HOMA-IR and intra-arterial blood pressure was performed. Endothelial function was measured through post occlusive hyperemia using Laser-Doppler. Different proinflammatory cytokines (TNFa, IL1b and IL6), vascular adhesion molecules (VEGF and E-Selectin) and adipokines (adiponectin, leptin, resistin and visfatin) were analysed on serum by ELISA. Ten biological-naïve patients with PsA having metabolic syndrome were given apremilast 30 mg twice daily for 6 months. All the measures were carried out at basal, week 4 and week 24 after apremilast treatment.ResultsThe prevalence of metabolic comorbidities such as MetSyn, obesity and insulin resistance (IR) was significant higher in PsA compared to HD. PsA patients had impaired endothelial function showed by a reduced peak flow and hyperaemia area and increased levels of VEGF and E-Selectin in serum. The levels of adipocytokines were significantly higher in PsA compared to HD. The body mass index values were significantly correlated with the clinical inflammatory parameters (CRP and ESR) and activity of the disease (swollen joints count and DAS28).Increased levels of HOMA-IR also correlated with DAS28, clinical and serological inflammatory markers, and diverse adipokines. Elevated levels of cytokines correlated with the activity of the disease and lipid alterations.Significant improvements in efficacy outcomes, including DAS-28 using erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), tender and swollen joint count, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), enthesitis and morning stiffness severity, were observed with apremilast at week 4. No changes on BMI were noticed. A significant reduction of intra-arterial blood pressure was evidenced since the first 4 weeks. Serum levels of Apolipoprotein A and B, insulin and HOMA-IR values were also significantly reduced after 24 weeks of treatment. Endothelial dysfunction was significantly restored shown by an increase of the peak flow and hyperaemia area and decreased adhesion molecules in serum. Levels of interleukins and adipokines were also modulated after apremilast treatment.ConclusionsPsA is associated with an increase in inflammatory cytokines and adipokines, alongside with an endothelial dysfunction. These alterations are related to the disease activity and the presence of metabolic comorbidities such as insulin resistance or obesity, contributing to the burden of cardiovascular disease risk.Apremilast might reduce IR, inflammation, hypertension, lipids and endothelial dysfunction, parameters strongly involved in cardiovascular disease.Ackno...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.