2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.05.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error-related ERP components and individual differences in punishment and reward sensitivity

Abstract: Although the focus of the discussion regarding the significance of the error related negatively (ERN/Ne) has been on the cognitive factors reflected in this component, there is now a growing body of research that describes influences of motivation, affective style and other factors of personality on ERN/Ne amplitude. The present study was conducted to further evaluate the relationship between affective style, error related ERP components and their neural basis. Therefore, we had our subjects fill out the Behav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

21
147
3
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(173 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
21
147
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The frontal midline region has also been strongly associated with response conflict monitoring (Botvinick, 2007;Botvinick, Cohen, & Carter, 2004), and the frontal midline error related negativity (ERN) has been linked to a personality factor of behavioural inhibition (Boksem, Tops, Wester, Meijman, & Lorist, 2006). At first sight, the lack of conflict-specific frontal midline power goes against this view.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frontal midline region has also been strongly associated with response conflict monitoring (Botvinick, 2007;Botvinick, Cohen, & Carter, 2004), and the frontal midline error related negativity (ERN) has been linked to a personality factor of behavioural inhibition (Boksem, Tops, Wester, Meijman, & Lorist, 2006). At first sight, the lack of conflict-specific frontal midline power goes against this view.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Boksem et al (2006) reported that individuals who score high on a measure of punishment sensitivity have larger ERN amplitudes than individuals who score low on such a measure. Pailing and Segalowitz (2004) demonstrated that individuals who score high on conscientiousness have smaller changes in ERN amplitudes with manipulations of motivation compared to individuals who score low on conscientiousness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, a number of studies demonstrated the influence of emotional/motivational factors on the ERN (e.g., Boksem et al, 2006;Luu et al, 2000;Pailing and Segalowitz, 2004;Ullsperger and Von Cramon, 2004). The general finding is that the ERN increases when monetary incentives are offered for accuracy (Gehring et al, 1993;Hajcak et al, 2005;Pailing and Segalowitz, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items are answered on a four-point Likert scale, indicating to what extent the subject considers the statement in the given item to be true for him or herself. In this study, the BIS scale was used because it was previously found to be correlated to feedback-related and error-related electrophysiological activity (Balconi et al 2010, Boksem et al, 2006, De Pascalis et al, 2010. A median-split procedure was used to classify participants as high BIS or low BIS.…”
Section: Bis / Bas Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional point is that self-report measures of punishment sensitivity (Behavioral Inhibition System [BIS]; Carver and White, 1994) have been found to be related to FRN amplitude. Higher punishment sensitivity scores were associated with larger amplitude FRN (Amodio et al, 2008;De Pascalis, Varriale, 2010), and its response related counterpart, the error related negativity (ERN; Boksem et al, 2008, Boksem et al, 2006. The BIS was originally proposed by Gray as a neurophysiological system underlying aversive motivation, consisting of the septo-hippocampal system and its cortical projections (Gray, 1982;Gray and McNaughton, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%