2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2006.00021.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Error Analysis of Digital Speckle Correlation Method Under Scanning Electron Microscope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the theory of mathematical statistics, because the number of calculated points of each image pair is less than 10,000, the limiting error of the measurement is less than four times the maximum SD, which is 0.136 pixels. As it has been reported that the maximum value of the SD is 0.3872 pixels (at 750×), 18 it can be seen that the baseline error of DIC under the digital microscope is much smaller than that under SEM.…”
Section: Precision Analysismentioning
confidence: 69%
“…According to the theory of mathematical statistics, because the number of calculated points of each image pair is less than 10,000, the limiting error of the measurement is less than four times the maximum SD, which is 0.136 pixels. As it has been reported that the maximum value of the SD is 0.3872 pixels (at 750×), 18 it can be seen that the baseline error of DIC under the digital microscope is much smaller than that under SEM.…”
Section: Precision Analysismentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Even though some work has been done to assess the accuracy of the measured displacement field with the DIC technique [18,[28][29][30], no quantitative analysis has been done in the case of very large local deformation to the authors' knowledge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DIC applies the images, which measure deformation from micrometer to nanometer range. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] If the image has spatial and high temporal, the result could be improved by DIC. 29,30 In previous studies, cell imaging was classified through machine learning (normal cell image, drug-treated cell image, diseased cell image, and cell movement).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%