1993
DOI: 10.1063/1.465126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: X-ray grazing incidence diffraction from alkylsiloxane monolayers on silicon wafers [J. Chem. Phys. 95, 2854 (1991)]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reflectivity shows sharp dips and oscillations owing to interference between x rays reflected at the silicon-organic and organic-air interfaces, and is thus highly sensitive to the monolayer thickness D. The first intensity dip gives a rough estimate of the thickness D: D =Q min [24][25] A, where the range depends on the sample. This is in excellent agreement with the landmark study by Tidswell et al of octadecylsilane monolayers in air [27]. Figure 1 shows the derived electron density profile corresponding to the best-fit reflectivity.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reflectivity shows sharp dips and oscillations owing to interference between x rays reflected at the silicon-organic and organic-air interfaces, and is thus highly sensitive to the monolayer thickness D. The first intensity dip gives a rough estimate of the thickness D: D =Q min [24][25] A, where the range depends on the sample. This is in excellent agreement with the landmark study by Tidswell et al of octadecylsilane monolayers in air [27]. Figure 1 shows the derived electron density profile corresponding to the best-fit reflectivity.…”
supporting
confidence: 85%
“…For quantification, least-squares comparisons between experimental and calculated reflectivities were made using the widely used PARRAT formalism [28], in which interfacial electron density is modeled with a series of error function profiles [26,27]. Fits of monolayers in air fixed parameters used to fit reflectivity of these same monolayers immersed in water, including the thicknesses, scattering length densities, and roughnesses for silicon oxide and bulk silicon layers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, we expect that for SAMs of OTS either the solvent is not excluded significantly from the compressed region under the tip or that solvent may ''channel'' through the SAM via a network of defects. ''Channeling'' that results in a larger diffusion coefficient is plausible because the molecular areas achieved in SAMS of OTS 0.21-25 nm 2 /chain 35,36,53 are larger than the molecular area of the 0.19 nm 2 /chain of the LB films of arachidic acid used by Vanderlick and coworkers. Also, SAMs of OTS do not display a long-range, quasicrystalline structure.…”
Section: Influence Of Load On Friction Maxima Changes With Chain Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can measure diffraction data from the thin film without peeling it from the substrate. As the use of synchrotron radiation increases, this method has been applied to a wide variety of thin‐film samples, such as monolayers at the water–air interface,11, 12 self‐assembled monolayers,13, 14 polymer surfaces,15, 16 and liquid‐crystalline polymers 17. It is also advantageous that the in‐plane structure, which cannot be detected with the conventional X‐ray diffraction method at reflection mode, can be measured with the TRXD system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%