2020
DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4834.4.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Erratum: MARCELO JOSÉ STURARO, JOÃO CARLOS LOPES COSTA, ADRIANO O. MACIEL, GERALDO R. LIMA-FILHO, FERNANDO J. M. ROJAS-RUNJAIC, DANIELA PAREJA MEJIA, SANTIAGO R. RON & PEDRO L. V. PELOSO (2020) Resolving the taxonomic puzzle of Boana cinerascens (Spix, 1824), with resurrection of Hyla granosa gracilis Melin, 1941 (Anura: Hylidae). Zootaxa, 4750: 1–30.

Abstract: On page 6, Figures 3C and 3D were published as duplicates of Figure 4A and 4B, erroneously showing the dorsolateral and frontal profiles of Boana gracilis (MPEG 40292), instead of Boana cinerascens (MPEG 40287). The corrected Figure 3 can be found below.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequent studies focused on several smaller groups within the family (e.g., Aguiar et al, 2007; Garda and Cannatella, 2007; Hua at al., 2009; Moen and Wiens, 2009; Coloma et al, 2012; Salerno et al, 2012; Faivovich et al, 2013, 2021; Jungfer et al, 2013; Caminer and Ron, 2014, 2020; Guayasamin et al, 2015; Berneck et al, 2016; Caviedes-Solis and Oca, 2017; Peloso et al, 2018; Araujo-Vieira et al, 2019; Sturaro et al, 2020; Fouquet et al, 2021). Our understanding of the phylogenetic relationships of the major clades has increased as well (Faivovich et al, 2010a, 2018; Pinheiro et al, 2019; Blotto et al, 2021; Orrico et al, 2021), although major, densely sampled and evidence-heavy analyses are still lacking for Pelodryadinae (the results of Duellman et al [2016] were based on GenBank sequences; relationships within this subfamily are in general poorly supported, the phylogenetic hypothesis was only marginally discussed, and 114 species have never been included in phylogenetic studies), and Scinaxini (Hylinae; Faivovich et al, 2005, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequent studies focused on several smaller groups within the family (e.g., Aguiar et al, 2007; Garda and Cannatella, 2007; Hua at al., 2009; Moen and Wiens, 2009; Coloma et al, 2012; Salerno et al, 2012; Faivovich et al, 2013, 2021; Jungfer et al, 2013; Caminer and Ron, 2014, 2020; Guayasamin et al, 2015; Berneck et al, 2016; Caviedes-Solis and Oca, 2017; Peloso et al, 2018; Araujo-Vieira et al, 2019; Sturaro et al, 2020; Fouquet et al, 2021). Our understanding of the phylogenetic relationships of the major clades has increased as well (Faivovich et al, 2010a, 2018; Pinheiro et al, 2019; Blotto et al, 2021; Orrico et al, 2021), although major, densely sampled and evidence-heavy analyses are still lacking for Pelodryadinae (the results of Duellman et al [2016] were based on GenBank sequences; relationships within this subfamily are in general poorly supported, the phylogenetic hypothesis was only marginally discussed, and 114 species have never been included in phylogenetic studies), and Scinaxini (Hylinae; Faivovich et al, 2005, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%