2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.nimb.2010.02.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ERD analysis and modification of TiO2 thin films with heavy ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The elemental composition of the as-deposited films was obtained by time-of-flight energy elastic recoil detection analysis (ToF-E ERDA) at an accuracy of  5% for Zr and  3% for B. The measurements were carried out with a 36 MeV 127 I 8+ ion beam using the set-up at Uppsala University [24,25]. The incident angle of primary ions and exit angle of recoils were both 67.5 ° to the sample surface normal giving a recoil angle of 45 °.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elemental composition of the as-deposited films was obtained by time-of-flight energy elastic recoil detection analysis (ToF-E ERDA) at an accuracy of  5% for Zr and  3% for B. The measurements were carried out with a 36 MeV 127 I 8+ ion beam using the set-up at Uppsala University [24,25]. The incident angle of primary ions and exit angle of recoils were both 67.5 ° to the sample surface normal giving a recoil angle of 45 °.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ion incident angle relative to the surface normal was 67.5° and the detector was positioned at a recoil angle of 45°. A detailed description of the experimental set-up has been given elsewhere [23,24]. A reference sample with known H content was used for calibration of the data.…”
Section: A General Experimental Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…36 MeV 127 I 8+ ions were used as projectiles with the incident angle set to 67.5° with respect to the surface normal and a recoil angle of 45° [23]. The recoil ToF-E ERDA spectra were analyzed using the CONTES code [24], where the measured recoil energy spectrum of each element was converted to relative atomic concentration, providing an error margin of ±1.5 at.% for the reported elemental compositions.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%