2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2021.103453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epistemic GDL: A logic for representing and reasoning about imperfect information games

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can find, in the scientific literature, approaches which primarily focus on theoretical models, describing games using mathematical models, like General Video Game Playing [1] or Epistemic GDL [5]. It is also worth mentioning the work presented in [3] (referenced in Table 3 as TWVGDL) which establishes the basis for a generic VGDL [6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can find, in the scientific literature, approaches which primarily focus on theoretical models, describing games using mathematical models, like General Video Game Playing [1] or Epistemic GDL [5]. It is also worth mentioning the work presented in [3] (referenced in Table 3 as TWVGDL) which establishes the basis for a generic VGDL [6].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another way is online education using online materials. Jiang et al [7] designed a logical framework for thinking in imperfect information games. The possibility of using the language to express rules of an imperfect information game and to formalize the common features of the logical game was shown in the works of Ndungo and Majuma [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our contribution is twofold. We first extend ADL with knowledge operators from Epistemic GDL [12] and the action modality from the GDL variant proposed in [21]. This extension aims at providing the ground for the design of General Auction Players.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these logics face decidability and tractability issues: their expressive power prevents them from being implemented realistically in an artificial agent. Jiang et al [12] propose an epistemic extension of GDL (EGDL) to represent and reason about imperfect information games. Their language allows us to represent the rules in the imperfect information setting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%