2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10840-010-9494-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Epicardial versus endocardial permanent pacing in adults with congenital heart disease

Abstract: Permanent pacing in CHD is associated with considerable morbidity and the need for repeat intervention, especially in those with Ebstein's anomaly. Epicardial pacing systems appear to have a higher incidence of lead failure and are significantly less durable in this group.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
44
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[14][15][16] However, whether the presence of a PFO in most CIED recipients increases the risk of clinical strokes or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) is unknown. Therefore, screening for a PFO is not routinely performed at the time of CIED implantation, and the presence or absence of a PFO does not affect the implant decision or strategy in current clinical practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16] However, whether the presence of a PFO in most CIED recipients increases the risk of clinical strokes or transient ischemic attacks (TIAs) is unknown. Therefore, screening for a PFO is not routinely performed at the time of CIED implantation, and the presence or absence of a PFO does not affect the implant decision or strategy in current clinical practice.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of epicardial implantation was also more often associated with exit block -an excitability threshold too high for pacing to be possible, which requires the implantation of a new pacemaker. Despite the increasingly common use of epicardial electrodes releasing steroidal drugs, some authors claim that the average time of the correct functioning of epicardial pacemakers is only 4 years [2,16]. The application of epicardial electrodes onto the myocardium after opening the pericardial sac bears the risk of post-pericardiotomy syndrome and increases the likelihood of perioperative complications resulting from the immobilization of the patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrophysiological studies were performed using the Cardiolab System (6.8.1 release 2, GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa, Wisconsin) using standard cardiac stimulators. Regular bipolar configurations between electrodes arranged in parallel between lead arms (1–2, 3–4, 5–6 and 7–8) or serially along each arm (13, 24, 15) were used (Figure 3). Sensed signals were gained 500 times and processed with 30 – 500 Hz band pass and 60 Hz notch filters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The alternative is the use of epicardial leads placed directly onto the left ventricle. However, this currently requires a surgical approach and there may need to be multiple revisions over time as these leads have an increased failure rate on long-term followup (4). With 2% of the adult population in the developed world currently suffering from heart failure, a rising prevalence as longevity increases, and with an estimated 5% to 10% of heart failure patients having an indication for CRT (5), there is an increasing role for more versatile pacing approaches to help overcome some of these limitations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%