2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2010.11.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Tritium (3H) and hydrochemical investigations to evaluate groundwater in Varahi and Markandeya river basins, Karnataka, India

Abstract: a b s t r a c tThe present study aimed at assessing the activity of natural radionuclides ( 3 H) and hydrochemical parameters (viz., pH, EC,) in the groundwater used for domestic and irrigation purposes in the Varahi and Markandeya river basins to understand the levels of hydrochemical parameters in terms of the relative age(s) of the groundwater contained within the study area.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the K-Mg geothermometer and silica geothermometer may not be appropriate for the reservoir temperature calculation as both will be largely affected by the dilution processes. The 10/ (10 K + Na) versus 10 Mg/(10 Mg + Ca) diagram proposed by Giggenbach [32] ( Figure 10) also shows the deviation of hot springs from the full equilibrium line, and the high Ca + Mg concentration in the Litang area (numbers [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] may indicate the faster equilibration of K-Mg and mixing with Ca-Mg-rich shallow waters [33]. This also explains why the reservoir temperatures calculated by the silica and K-Mg geothermometer are much lower than the other cation geothermometer in the Litang area.…”
Section: Origin Of the Water By O And H Isotopementioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus, the K-Mg geothermometer and silica geothermometer may not be appropriate for the reservoir temperature calculation as both will be largely affected by the dilution processes. The 10/ (10 K + Na) versus 10 Mg/(10 Mg + Ca) diagram proposed by Giggenbach [32] ( Figure 10) also shows the deviation of hot springs from the full equilibrium line, and the high Ca + Mg concentration in the Litang area (numbers [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] may indicate the faster equilibration of K-Mg and mixing with Ca-Mg-rich shallow waters [33]. This also explains why the reservoir temperatures calculated by the silica and K-Mg geothermometer are much lower than the other cation geothermometer in the Litang area.…”
Section: Origin Of the Water By O And H Isotopementioning
confidence: 72%
“…All the hot springs (except for the number 10 spring) are falling below and away from the GMWL, and the springs in the Litang area show more negative δD and δ 18 O than those in the Yidun area ( Figure 3). For the surface water collected from nearby, the δ 18 5 Geofluids water with old groundwater and groundwater having been subjected to radioactive decay [5,19]. The tritium concentrations are less than 1 in number 1, number 4, number 8, number 2, number 13, number 12, number 21, number 15, and number 11 springs and are larger than 1 in the number 10 spring (Table 1).…”
Section: General Hydrogeochemistry the Water Chemistry Of The 24 Hotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All standard deviation values (AE) were recorded beside each concentration and showed variation in the seven tested samples as RAD7 depends on the Poisson distribution used to calculate the standard deviation [8]. The mechanism of transferring samples (aerating, type of water flow, travel time, and time of storage) is one of the critical reasons affecting the measured results [14,15]. These factors are the controlling variables affecting the radioactivity of the 222 Rn isotope.…”
Section: The Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tritium contents below 1 TU suggest an ancient (older than 60 years of age) groundwater source, whereas values above 1 TU represent a modern (younger than 60 years of age) groundwater source [29]. Thus, the tritium values varying from 1.3 to 11.5 TU indicated a mixture of modern and old groundwater when ascending towards the surface [30,31].…”
Section: Source Of Rechargementioning
confidence: 99%