Primate Vocal Communication 1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-73769-5_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental Influences on the Structure of Primate Vocalizations

Abstract: Under natural conditions vocal signals are embedded in background noises, and are degraded by the action of diffraction, reflection, frequency-dependent absorption, and refraction. A fuller appreciation of the evolution of communication systems may be achieved by developing an understanding of the impediments to communication which occur in the natural environment, and investigating possible adaptations in the structure of either productive and receptive systems which may act to counter these impediments. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(34 reference statements)
2
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We used a cross correlation analysis to quantify degradation as a function of distance, similar to the method used by Brown and Waser (1988) to quantify primate call degradation. The higher the cross correlation coefficient, the more similar are two calls, and thus the less degradation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used a cross correlation analysis to quantify degradation as a function of distance, similar to the method used by Brown and Waser (1988) to quantify primate call degradation. The higher the cross correlation coefficient, the more similar are two calls, and thus the less degradation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morton 1975;Waser and Waser 1977;Wallschläger 1981Wallschläger , 1985Brown and Waser 1988;Wiley 1991;Brown and Gomez 1992;Brown et al 1995;Daniel and Blumstein 1998;Slabbekoorn and Smith 2002;Ryan and Kime 2003;Saunders and Slotow 2004;Blumstein and Turner 2005;Boncoraglio and Saino 2007). Data on diverse vertebrate taxa support this hypothesis (Morton 1975;Gish and Morton 1981;Wallschläger 1980Wallschläger , 1982Wallschläger , 1985Wallschläger and Nikolskij 1985;Masters 1991;Saunders and Slotow 2004;Slabbekoorn 2004;Seddon 2005;Nicholls and Goldizen 2006;Tubaro and Lijtmaer 2006), while in other taxa it is only supported weakly (Blumstein and Turner 2005;Boncoraglio and Saino 2007) or is not supported (Daniel and Blumstein 1998;Kime et al 2000;Saunders and Slotow 2004).…”
Section: Acoustic Adaptation Hypothesis (Aah)mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…First, in in tensity, acoustic structure, and time of emis sion long calls conform best to the criteria for sounds designed to carry over long distances [39,40], In addition, by being emitted from the sleeping sites at the top of the emergent trees, they might be less attenuated or subject to reverberation than if given through the dense foliage by monkeys travelling during the day [36].…”
Section: Time Of Day H Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%