In the first part of the work the dehydration of bioethanol
by
extractive distillation was considered to define the best simple column
sequence. It was proved that among all the simple configurations generated,
two sequences with three columns are able to consistently reduce the
energy demand and the capital costs compare to the four-column sequence
used as a reference. Then, starting from the selected simple column
configurations different complex sequences were predicted. It was
evidenced that thermally coupled configurations realized only a limited
saving in the capital costs. The two column configuration with a vapor
side stream is able to reduce the capital costs, but not all the solvent
can be recovered. Its convenience is related to the trade-off between
the solvent cost and the savings in the capital costs achieved. The
two-column configurations with a divided wall column represent an
excellent alternative for bioethanol production because their performances
are not limited by the solvent recovery.