Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research

Velt, Hannes; Torkkeli, Lasse; Laine, Igor

doi:10.4018/jbe.20200701.oa1

Cited by 45 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 167 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The analysis we propose in this work is exploratory [59]. To carry it out, we followed the phases proposed by Velt et al [44]: formulation, identification, selection, confirmation, analysis and thematic synthesis.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The second stage proposed by Velt et al [44] is the identification stage. In this stage, the search patterns [60] were established on the basis of the identification keywords and the search time horizon was also determined.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Following Vega-Muñoz et al [48], a search vector, its logical conjunction connectors and proximity restrictions were established for the keywords "Family Firms" and "Socio-emotional wealth" in the Web of Science (WoS). Following the recommendations of Velt et al [44], the most relevant WoS categories in the field of socio-emotional wealth research were selected, such as the Social Science Citation Index (SCI-E), Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The advantage of this type of study is that it allows us to make a "map" of the research on socioemotional wealth, indicating the most prominent authors, which countries they are from, which institutions they work in, with which other authors they collaborate, what fields of development they have, etc. The justification that has led us to opt for bibliometric analysis is that it is a rigorous, less biased method and allows a pleasant view of research in the field of socioemotional wealth by using scientific research metadata [43][44][45].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Scientometric Analysis of Research on Socioemotional Wealth

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Scientometric studies have become very important within the scientific environment in general, and in the family firm area in particular. This study aims at conducting a bibliometric analysis of socioemotional wealth within family firms. To this end, a background search of the terms family firm and socioemotional wealth has been carried out in the Web of Science, specifically in specialized journals published between 1975 and 2019 in the Science Citation Index. The resulting scientometric analyses are of the number of papers and citations, the main authors and journals, the WoS categories, the institutions, the countries and the word co-occurrence. One of the main conclusions of this paper is the abundance of studies that have been conducted on socioemotional wealth in family firms, which is reflected in the number of publications (501) and of citations of these studies (12,090). Another significant revelation is the copious number of authors, with Gómez-Mejía being the most relevant one and De Massis the one with the highest number of publications. Also noteworthy are the many USA-based institutions, with the Mississippi State University and the University of North Carolina being the two most prominent. In addition, studies have been carried out about family firms’ focus, mainly, on performance and ownership.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Scientometric Analysis of Research on Socioemotional Wealth

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Clusters are increasingly treated as orchestrators of an innovation ecosystem supporting the broadly understood processes of knowledge creation [38]. The concept of an ecosystem started as an ecological metaphor to explain the system-level complexities and can cover many types [39]. An innovation ecosystem in particular is defined as "interconnected organizations, organized around a focal firm or a platform, and incorporating both production and use side participants, and focusing on the development of new value through innovation" [40,41].…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Sustainability of Cluster Organizations as Open Innovation Intermediaries

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the paper is to identify the most important open innovation practices used by cluster organizations (COs). To reflect these practices, the paper uses the concept of the trajectory of relationship development in COs, applied in the Interizon cluster organization. Additionally, this paper introduces the potential sustainability-related implications of open innovation adoption in cluster organizations. An in-depth direct interview and secondary data analysis were the basic techniques used for data collection. The study demonstrates that cluster organizations can play the role of open innovation intermediaries, implementing a set of different open innovation practices, depending on the level of advancement of cluster cooperation. The use of these practices leads to the development of ever stronger relationships between cluster members, thus conditioning access to the increasingly valuable resources of information and knowledge which are most relevant for the future sustainability-pursuing context. The good effects of multidimensional cooperation in the studied cluster organization prompted the authors to formulate a recommendation for sustainable diversity in the CO. The research goes beyond the state-of-the-art knowledge in the concept of industrial clusters by exposing a broader view on cooperation developed within cluster organizations. The study links the issue of clustering with the concept of open innovation, shedding new light on the processes of supporting knowledge and information flows in COs. Additionally, it contributes to developing a broader comprehension of the context dependencies of open innovation for potential sustainable innovation.

show abstract

Rereading entrepreneurial failure from the scientific literature: A bibliometric approach

Tessier¹,

Ramadan

Renaud³

2023

Can J Adm Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Academic literature analyzing the conditions of entrepreneurial failure has emerged in the last decade. Failure can be interpreted in several ways: failure as the disappearance of the firm, failure based on flawed strategies, organizational failure, and failure defined by the entrepreneur's perception. We mobilize a bibliometric technique and identify different scientific conversations initiated between 2016 and 2021. We conducted a bibliometric study using the bibliographic linkage method on 198 articles. This article is divided into three sections. First, we review the methodological choices made, then we describe the results before discussing their generic implications for understanding the phenomenon of failure.

show abstract

Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Research

Cited by 45 publications

References 167 publications

Scientometric Analysis of Research on Socioemotional Wealth

Scientometric Analysis of Research on Socioemotional Wealth

Sustainability of Cluster Organizations as Open Innovation Intermediaries

Rereading entrepreneurial failure from the scientific literature: A bibliometric approach

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About