Enriching ontologies with multilingual information

Montiel-Ponsoda, Elena; de, Guadalupe Aguado; Gímez-Pérez, A.; Peters, Wim

doi:10.1017/s1351324910000082

Cited by 50 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 11 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In this chapter, we build on the method proposed in [30]. This method follows an iterative incremental model that covers the following activities: (1) specification, for analyzing and selecting data sources, (2) modeling, for developing the model that represents the information domain of the data sources, (3) generation, for transforming the data sources into RDF datasets, (4) linking, for creating links between different RDF datasets, (5) publication, for publishing the model, RDF datasets and links generated on the Web, and (6) exploitation, for developing applications that consume the dataset in question.…”

Section: Methodological Guidelinesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Surprisingly, the language dimension in VoID is not included in its specification. DCAT, on the other hand, includes a property to indicate language by means of the dcterms:language property, and defines the range of the property in the following way: (1) use resources defined by the Library of Congress 29,30 , (2) if an ISO 639-1 (two-letter) code is defined for language, then its corresponding IRI should be used;, otherwise (3) if no ISO 639-1 code is defined, then the IRI corresponding to the ISO 639-2 (three-letter) code should be used. As both VoID and DCAT reuse the Dublin Core Metadata Terms 31 vocabulary for providing basic metadata (e.g., dcterms:publisher, dcterms:title, etc.…”

Section: Publicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Over the last years, several methodological guidelines for publishing linked data have been proposed [30,17] and successfully applied to several domains of knowledge such as, mass media [20], geography [2,28], or cultural heritage [18,27]. These guidelines provide a principled way for publishing and consuming Linked Data through a series of clearly defined activities whose objective is to produce high quality best practice compliant linked data.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Guidelines for multilingual linked data

Gómez-Pérez

Vila-Suero

Montiel-Ponsoda

et al. 2013

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, we argue that there is a growing number of linked datasets in different natural languages, and that there is a need for guidelines and mechanisms to ensure the quality and organic growth of this emerging multilingual data network. However, we have little knowledge regarding the actual state of this data network, its current practices, and the open challenges that it poses. Questions regarding the distribution of natural languages, the links that are established across data in different languages, or how linguistic features are represented, remain mostly unanswered. Addressing these and other language-related issues can help to identify existing problems, propose new mechanisms and guidelines or adapt the ones in use for publishing linked data including language-related features, and, ultimately, provide metrics to evaluate quality aspects. In this article we review, discuss, and extend current guidelines for publishing linked data by focusing on those methods, techniques and tools that can help RDF publishers to cope with language barriers. Whenever possible, we will illustrate and discuss each of these guidelines, methods, and tools on the basis of practical examples that we have encountered in the publication of the datos.bne.es dataset.

show abstract

Section: Methodological Guidelinesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Publicationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Guidelines for multilingual linked data

Gómez-Pérez

Vila-Suero

Montiel-Ponsoda

et al. 2013

Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…, Trojahn et al (2008) or Montiel-Ponsoda et al (2009) propose ontology localization on this basis. This is the case in many technical domains, like engineering, biology, etc.…”

Section: Multilinguality and Localizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Towards the Multilingual Semantic Web

Buitelaar¹,

Cimiano²

2014

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀ ĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀ @@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ ĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀĀ 383-388 Número 11, Formació i tecnologies de la traducció Revista Tradumàtica: tecnologies de la traducció. desembre 2013. ISSN: 1578-7559 http://revistes.uab.cat/tradumatica Els continguts de la revista estan subjectes a una llicència Creative Commons (CC BY 3.0) ABSTRACT Expertise in web accessibility matters has not been traditionally observed as a requirement for localisation professionals. Similarly, not enough evidence exists with regard their role as contributors to multilingual web accessibility. This paper presents the initial results of a study carried out with the goal of clarifying localisers' involvement in the achievement of web accessibility. Data gathered suggest that (1) localisation experts should have web accessibility knowledge as part of their skills set; and that (2) localisers' participation in multilingual web assessment for accessibility would be of added-value for evaluators. RESUM (Cap a una definició del paper del localitzador en la consecució de llocs web multilingües més accessibles) Tenir coneixements sobre accessibilitat no constitueix habitualment un requisit per a desenvolupar tasques de localització de forma professional. D'igual manera, existeix poca informació sobre el paper que podria tenir el localitzador en la consecució d'una web més accessible. Les dades incloses en aquest article, recollides a partir d'una enquesta realitzada a experts en accessibilitat web indiquen que (1), els localitzadors haurien d'adquirir coneixements sobre accessibilitat com a part de la seva formació i que (2), les seves competències professionals podrien de ser rellevants durant l'avaluació de l'accessibilitat web de llocs web multilingües. Paraules clau: Web multilingüe; localització web; accessibilitat web; professionals de la web RESUMEN (Hacia una definición del papel del localizador en la consecución de sitios web multilingües más accesibles) Tener conocimientos sobre accesibilidad no constituye habitualmente un requisito para desempeñar labores de localización de forma profesional. Del mismo modo, existe poca información acerca del papel que podría tener el localizador en la consecución de una web más accesible. Los datos incluidos en el presente artículo, recogidos a partir de una encuesta realizada a expertos en accesibilidad web, indican que (1) los localizadores deberían adquirir conocimientos sobre accesibilidad como parte de su formación, y que (2) sus competencias profesionales podrían ser relevantes durante la evaluación de accesibilidad web de sitios web multilingües. Palabras clave: Web multilingüe; localización web; accesibilidad web; profesionales de la web

show abstract

“…In that sense, both terminologies and ontologies aim to reach a common understanding of a domain, by sharing knowledge, although there are also differences both in formalization, purpose, and explicitation, to mention just a few. In the computational field, one of the challenges at this stage is to represent all the terminological as well as the multilingual and linguistic information, which can be in other lexicographic resources, and/or in ontologies (Huang et al 2010, Montiel-Ponsoda et al 2011). …”

Section: Approaches To Build a Glossarymentioning

confidence: 99%

Lights and shadows in creating a glossary about ontology engineering

Suárez-Figueroa¹,

de²,

Gómez-Pérez³

2013

TERM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper addresses the lack of an explicitly agreed and defined terminology in the ontology engineering field, and particularly, the need for a glossary, which consists of terms and definitions for actions when developing ontologies. The novelty of this paper lies in the precise description of a methodology for building a glossary with the processes and activities involved in ontology development as well as the relations between them (such as subtype, composition and synonym). The methodology proposed in this paper takes its inspiration from ideas taken from earlier research on methodological processes for creating multilingual terminological products and for defining a glossary in a particular domain as well as on domain knowledge organization. The description of our methodology includes the approach followed and the steps carried out, as well as the key issues that arise when the glossary was being created. So far as we are aware, this is the first attempt to normalize the terminology (denominations and definitions) of process and activities in ontology building.

show abstract

Enriching ontologies with multilingual information

Cited by 50 publications

References 11 publications

Guidelines for multilingual linked data

Guidelines for multilingual linked data

Towards the Multilingual Semantic Web

Lights and shadows in creating a glossary about ontology engineering

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About