2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00726-013-1624-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enhanced flux of substrates into polyamine biosynthesis but not ethylene in tomato fruit engineered with yeast S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase gene

Abstract: S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), a major substrate in 1-C metabolism is a common precursor in the biosynthetic pathways of polyamines and ethylene, two important plant growth regulators, which exhibit opposing developmental effects, especially during fruit ripening. However, the flux of various substrates including SAM into the two competing pathways in plants has not yet been characterized. We used radiolabeled (14)C-Arg, (14)C-Orn, L-[U-(14)C]Met, (14)C-SAM and (14)C-Put to quantify flux through these pathways in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
1
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
28
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we found no evidence for elevated levels of total PAs, Put, Spd, or Spm during the steady-state period (8–46 weeks) in response to 1-MCP treatment; indeed the levels tended to be lower regardless of CO 2 ( Figures 2 – 5 ), suggesting that the availability of SAM for PA biosynthesis in apple fruit was not influenced by the 1-MCP treatment. These findings are consistent with previous studies of ripening apple and tomato fruits, which suggest that the requirement for SAM in PA biosynthesis is not limited by the requirement in ethylene biosynthesis (Van de Poel et al, 2013; Lasanajak et al, 2014), and suggest an unknown biochemical or transcriptional mechanism, possibly altering the PA biosynthetic rates from glutamate (Alcázar et al, 2010; Majumdar et al, 2013), was responsible for the lower total PA levels in 1-MCP-treated fruit under CA storage. However, these findings are at odds with the generally accepted view that PAs, especially Spd and Spm, accumulate in respond to abiotic stress (Groppa and Benavides, 2008; Bassard et al, 2010; Shelp et al, 2012c), which could be due to a variety of reasons: that view is generally based on free PA levels, rather than total PAs; apple fruit experience multiple stresses during CA storage; and, ripening apple fruit, like tomato fruit (Mattoo et al, 2010), are at a terminal developmental stage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, we found no evidence for elevated levels of total PAs, Put, Spd, or Spm during the steady-state period (8–46 weeks) in response to 1-MCP treatment; indeed the levels tended to be lower regardless of CO 2 ( Figures 2 – 5 ), suggesting that the availability of SAM for PA biosynthesis in apple fruit was not influenced by the 1-MCP treatment. These findings are consistent with previous studies of ripening apple and tomato fruits, which suggest that the requirement for SAM in PA biosynthesis is not limited by the requirement in ethylene biosynthesis (Van de Poel et al, 2013; Lasanajak et al, 2014), and suggest an unknown biochemical or transcriptional mechanism, possibly altering the PA biosynthetic rates from glutamate (Alcázar et al, 2010; Majumdar et al, 2013), was responsible for the lower total PA levels in 1-MCP-treated fruit under CA storage. However, these findings are at odds with the generally accepted view that PAs, especially Spd and Spm, accumulate in respond to abiotic stress (Groppa and Benavides, 2008; Bassard et al, 2010; Shelp et al, 2012c), which could be due to a variety of reasons: that view is generally based on free PA levels, rather than total PAs; apple fruit experience multiple stresses during CA storage; and, ripening apple fruit, like tomato fruit (Mattoo et al, 2010), are at a terminal developmental stage.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…During the ripening of a bulky fruit such as tomato, there is an inverse relationship between the production of higher PAs and ethylene (Lasanajak et al, 2014), 1-MCP treatment inhibits autocatalytic ethylene production without affecting SAM levels (Van de Poel et al, 2013), and decreased levels of ethylene in RNAi-1-aminocyclpropane-1-carboxylate synthase fruits enhance PA levels and upregulate PA biosynthesis genes (Gupta et al, 2013). Research with non-bulky fruits such as rice grain also suggests interaction between PAs and ethylene in regulating plant growth and in response to environmental stress (Chen et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being a major substrate in 1-C metabolism and involved in methylation processes, SAM diverted to PAs and/or ethylene during leaf senescence needs to be assessed metabolically, as has been described recently in the tomato system (Lasanajak et al 2014). Regulation of SAM levels in mammalian cells was found regulated involving post-translational inhibition of glycine N -methyltransferase by folate (Luka et al, 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PAs together with salicylic acid regulated ethylene biosynthesis by affecting the accumulation of ACC synthase transcripts. PAs and ethylene acted on the contrary, by sharing S-Adenosyl methionine(SAM) as precursors to affect plant growth and senescence, plant cells transferred SAM into PA biosynthesis, or ethylene biosynthesis, or both (Lasanajak et al, 2014). Nambeesan et al (2010) confirmed that lycopene content and juice viscosity increased by studying the transgenic over-expression of yeast SAMPC and yeast SPDC of tomato.…”
Section: Effects Of Polyamines On Fruit Ripeningmentioning
confidence: 91%