Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-31056-5_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Engagement Perception and Generation for Social Robots and Virtual Agents

Abstract: Technology is the future, woven into every aspect of our lives, but how are we to interact with all this technology and what happens when problems arise? Artificial agents, such as virtual characters and social robots could offer a realistic solution to help facilitate interactions between humans and machines-if only these agents were better equipped and more informed to hold up their end of an interaction. People and machines can interact to do things together, but in order to get the most out of every intera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Social engagement very often also includes an affective component (see for example Corrigan et al, 2016 ; Biancardi et al, 2019a ; Sohail et al, 2019 ; Youssef et al, 2019 ). The definition of the affective component of engagement often remains vague.…”
Section: Definition Of Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social engagement very often also includes an affective component (see for example Corrigan et al, 2016 ; Biancardi et al, 2019a ; Sohail et al, 2019 ; Youssef et al, 2019 ). The definition of the affective component of engagement often remains vague.…”
Section: Definition Of Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we focus on the user's level of engagement. So, we now present our computational model of user's engagement based on the works of Corrigan et al ( 2016 ) and Sidner and Dzikovska ( 2005 ). In our model, user's engagement can be expressed at three different levels, corresponding to different types of non-verbal signals:…”
Section: System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cognitive engagement –(Corrigan et al, 2016 ) claims that “frowning may indicate effortful processing suggesting high levels of cognitive engagement.” The same work also refers to signals such as “looking for a brief interval outside the scene” as indicators of cognitive engagement.…”
Section: System Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations