2017
DOI: 10.1177/1687814017711394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy efficiency evaluation of a natural gas pipeline based on an analytic hierarchy process

Abstract: A long-distance natural gas pipeline system consists of considerable equipment and many pipe segments, but the conventional energy efficiency index of a natural gas pipeline is considered as a whole. Because the specific energy consumption of each unit cannot be determined, the index system is not perfect, and evaluating the energy efficiency of a natural gas pipeline system is difficult. The energy efficiency evaluation model for a natural gas pipeline was established using the analytic hierarchy process. A j… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The AHP, which is proposed by Saaty in the early 1970s, is a hierarchical weight decision analysis method. [36][37][38] Based on AHP, we can decompose the elements associated with decisions into goals, criteria, plans, and so on and develop qualitative and quantitative analyses. AHP is applied to calculate index weights for APGL.…”
Section: Fahpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AHP, which is proposed by Saaty in the early 1970s, is a hierarchical weight decision analysis method. [36][37][38] Based on AHP, we can decompose the elements associated with decisions into goals, criteria, plans, and so on and develop qualitative and quantitative analyses. AHP is applied to calculate index weights for APGL.…”
Section: Fahpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are 29 metering branches along the route, including 15 gas stations and one underground gas storage, as shown in Figure 4. 22 The standard uncertainty of various types of flow rates and instruments is shown in Table 1, and the monthly operating dates of gas transmission trunk lines in the first half of 2018 are given in Table 2. Here, USG in and USG out , respectively, represent the gas production volume and gas injection volume of the underground gas storage, from which the relevant data of actual transmission loss can be obtained (Table 3).…”
Section: Case Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%