An evaluation method for green logistics system design of agricultural products: A case study in Shandong province, China

Ni, Songyuan; Lin, Yu; Li, Yongxing; Shao, Hui; Wang, Shiguang

doi:10.1177/1687814018816878

Cited by 16 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 30 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Li et al (2020) proposed an improved analytic hierarchy process-back propagation (AHP-BP) neural network algorithm to evaluate companies' CSR performance, and results showed that this improved AHP-BP neural network model could effectively estimate CSR performance. Ni et al (2019) established a green index system and quantitatively evaluated the environmental quality of Guizhou geological parks based on the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation system. The subjective method can determine the importance of the evaluation index according to expert experience.…”

Section: Evaluation Of Environmental Responsibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Combined evaluation of corporate ecological and environmental responsibility: Evidence for forest preservation from Chinese forestry companies

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The ecological benefit of forest has an important influence on the sustainable development of society, thus, forest management has become a critical strategic action. Forest preservation is an inclusive process which depends on collaboration among a wide range of stakeholders. Forestry companies, who own and manage forest resources, are responsible for forest preservation and ecological construction, which is called corporate ecological environmental responsibility (CEER). Most existing analyses, however, were limited to corporate environmental responsibility (CER) and ignored the ecological responsibility of forestry enterprises. Therefore, in order to better play the role of forestry companies in forest preservation, it is urgent to define the content and the measurement of CEER. This paper established a CEER index system based on the characteristics of forestry enterprises. Furthermore, evaluated the CEER level of forestry enterprises using the combined evaluation method based on the GINI criterion, which is more effective and reasonable. It is found that forestry ecological environmental responsibility emphasizes ecological improvement and has shifted from traditional environmental protection to ecological construction. Qingshan Paper, Sun Paper, and Yong’an Forestry perform the best in CEER among all forestry companies. In addition, the results showed a low level but an obvious upward trend in forestry CEER and a noticeable heterogeneity in the performance of CEER in different forestry industries. Our findings can be useful for further promoting the ecological benefits of forest companies and developing relevant policies.

show abstract

Section: Evaluation Of Environmental Responsibilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Combined evaluation of corporate ecological and environmental responsibility: Evidence for forest preservation from Chinese forestry companies

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Zhang et al (2017) developed a quantitative risk assessment method to assess the condition of the fresh agricultural products cold chain process [32]. Second, in order to solve the environmental issue caused by logistics of agricultural products, Ni et al (2019) established a scientific and reasonable agricultural products green logistics evaluation system [33]. What's more, Zhang et al (2016) and Sheng (2014) studied evaluation of regional logistics competitiveness and technical efficiency measurement respectively using the panel data of 31 provinces [34,35].…”

Section: Logistics Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agricultural Products Crowd Logistics: A Literature Review and Research Agenda

Su¹,

Zhang²,

Li³

2021

Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Social Science and Contemporary Humanity Development (SSCHD 2020)

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

As an innovative business model, agricultural products crowd logistics (APCL) is emerging rapidly. The focus of this paper is to carry out a literature review on APCL grounded in literature of crowd logistics (CL) and agricultural products logistics (APL), and then provides an agenda for future research. The research areas of CL focus on innovative business model, operational mechanism and value creation in urban area or cities, while researchers in the field of APL focus on logistics facility and equipment, operation mode, optimization of path planning, and, finally, logistics assessment. We propose the first conceptual definition of APCL. Potential topics, possible research questions, combined with relating research methods are provided for future research in order to deepen knowledge about APCL phenomenon.

show abstract

“…Herold and Lee [64] investigated the carbon reports disclosed by some giant international logistics enterprises, e.g., UPS, FedX and DHL, and compared their sustainability-related strategies, namely legitimacy-seeking arguments versus energy and emission reduction. In addition, a variety of qualitative analysis measures, such as fuzzy multi-criteria evaluation modeling [65], data envelopment analysis [66], and analytic hierarchy processes [67] were also widely applied to illuminate the logic between SEE performance and G&SL.…”

Section: Evaluation On the Social Environmental And Economic Impactsmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Systematic Literature Review of Green and Sustainable Logistics: Bibliometric Analysis, Research Trend and Knowledge Taxonomy

Ren

Dong

Sun

et al. 2019

IJERPH

138

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Ever-growing globalization and industrialization put forward impending requirements for green and sustainable logistics (G&SL). Over the past decades, G&SL initiatives triggered worldwide deliberations, aiming at easing negative transport externalities and improving supply chain performance. This review-based paper attempts to offer a joint quantitative and qualitative understanding for the overall evolutionary trend, knowledge structure, and literature gaps of the G&SL research field. Employing the science mapping approach, a total of 306 major paper published from 1999 to 2019 were retrieved, elaborated on, and synthesized. Visualized statistics regarding publication years, journal allocation/co-citation, inter-country/institution collaboration, influential articles, co-occurred keywords, and time view clusters of research themes were analyzed bibliographically. On this basis, a total of 50 sub-branches of G&SL knowledge were classified and thematically discussed based on five alignments, namely (i) social-environmental-economic research, (ii) planning, policy and management, (iii) application and practice, (iv) technology, and (v) operations research. Finally, the current knowledge obstacles and the future research opportunities were suggested. The findings contribute to portray a systematic intellectual prospect for the state quo, hotspots, and academic frontiers of G&SL research. Moreover, it provides researchers and practitioners with heuristic thoughts to govern transportation ecology and logistics service quality.

show abstract

An evaluation method for green logistics system design of agricultural products: A case study in Shandong province, China

Cited by 16 publications

References 30 publications

Combined evaluation of corporate ecological and environmental responsibility: Evidence for forest preservation from Chinese forestry companies

Combined evaluation of corporate ecological and environmental responsibility: Evidence for forest preservation from Chinese forestry companies

Agricultural Products Crowd Logistics: A Literature Review and Research Agenda

A Systematic Literature Review of Green and Sustainable Logistics: Bibliometric Analysis, Research Trend and Knowledge Taxonomy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About