The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Water Sciences 2017
DOI: 10.3390/ecws-2-04953
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy Efficiency Analysis of Wheat Crop under Different Climate- and Soil-Based Irrigation Schedules

Abstract: Use of energy in the agriculture sector has directly or indirectly been intensified to increase crop production to fulfill the food demand of the growing population. Considering the energy and water scarcity in Pakistan, the present study was carried out to assess wheat production efficiency with regard to energy consumption. For this purpose, a field experiment was conducted at the Water Management Research Centre (WMRC), University of Agriculture Faisalabad, to compare two irrigation scheduling techniques (c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The nitrogen energy input varied from 5208 MJ at the low N60 to 20832 MJ.ha -1 at N240. Ansari et al (2018) indicate that the average energy consumption in wheat production for nitrogen is 6878 MJ.ha -1 , which is lower than the received our results. The energy efficiency of nitrogen fertilization in durum wheat and sorghum varied depending on the amount of incorporated nitrogen and the energy produced in the additional grain yield (Table 3).…”
contrasting
confidence: 78%
“…The nitrogen energy input varied from 5208 MJ at the low N60 to 20832 MJ.ha -1 at N240. Ansari et al (2018) indicate that the average energy consumption in wheat production for nitrogen is 6878 MJ.ha -1 , which is lower than the received our results. The energy efficiency of nitrogen fertilization in durum wheat and sorghum varied depending on the amount of incorporated nitrogen and the energy produced in the additional grain yield (Table 3).…”
contrasting
confidence: 78%
“…It is often characteristic of this type of production, which limits the excessive interference of machines and agricultural chemicals into the soil. Sławiński et al, 2009;3 Sławiński, 2011;4 Kuczuk (a), 2016; 5 Ansari et al, 2018;6 Pimentel, 2006) Similar relations of cumulative energy consumption results apply to animal production. Ecological livestock production usually requires lower energy inputs than its conventional equivalent (Table 2).…”
Section: Cumulative Energy Efficiency Of Agricultural Productionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…the type of soil, layout of a farm and shape of fields, plant structure, type of applied machinery, and finally the type of the production system: intensive or one that is focused on limiting the effect on the natural environment. The inputs incurred on production in a given farm may also differ in subsequent years due to varying weather conditions, changes in the irrigation system (Ansari et al, 2018), as well as the use of the technologies (e.g. advancements in the machinery park, reduction of chemical use).…”
Section: Cumulative Energy Efficiency Of Agricultural Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The energy use efficiency is the direct indicator of greenhouse gas emission [37,38]. The quantification of energy use efficiency [39,40,31,34] of electrostatic sprayer in comparison with the knapsack powered mist blower and air compression sprayers in application of agricultural pesticides is need of the hour [41,42,14,43,44].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%