2016
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b09955
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Energy and Electron Transfer Cascade in Self-Assembled Bilayer Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells

Abstract: Current high efficiency dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) rely on the incorporation of multiple chromophores, via either codeposition or preformed assemblies, as a means of increasing broad band light absorption. These strategies have some inherent limitations including decreased total light absorption by each of the dyes, low surface loadings, and complex synthetic procedures. In this report, we introduce an alternative strategy, self-assembled bilayers, as a simple, stepwise method of incorporating two comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lower-energy absorption spectra of these films are slightly expanded with that of the monomer 1 in CH 2 Cl 2 (Figure b), possibly caused by the molecular aggregation in the film state. The coverage Γ of these films was estimated by Γ = A 350nm /(ε 350nm × 1000), where A 350nm and ε 350nm refer to the absorbance of the film at 350 nm and the molar extinction coefficient of the monomer 1 at 350 nm (ε 350nm = 0.58 × 10 –5 M –1 cm –1 ), respectively, assuming that the monomer and polymer have similar molar extinction coefficients at this wavelength . In this sense, films poly- 1 (A) to poly- 1 (D) have a Γ of 2.6 × 10 –9 , 3.1 × 10 –9 , 4.6 × 10 –9 , and 5.7 × 10 –9 mol/cm 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower-energy absorption spectra of these films are slightly expanded with that of the monomer 1 in CH 2 Cl 2 (Figure b), possibly caused by the molecular aggregation in the film state. The coverage Γ of these films was estimated by Γ = A 350nm /(ε 350nm × 1000), where A 350nm and ε 350nm refer to the absorbance of the film at 350 nm and the molar extinction coefficient of the monomer 1 at 350 nm (ε 350nm = 0.58 × 10 –5 M –1 cm –1 ), respectively, assuming that the monomer and polymer have similar molar extinction coefficients at this wavelength . In this sense, films poly- 1 (A) to poly- 1 (D) have a Γ of 2.6 × 10 –9 , 3.1 × 10 –9 , 4.6 × 10 –9 , and 5.7 × 10 –9 mol/cm 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4), we saw no evidence of Os to A + electron transfer occurring in the TiO 2 - A -Zn- Os film. While interlayer electron transfer has been observed, 50 the increased distance and geometric constraint imparted by the metal ion linkage can also hinder electron transfer. 48 Consequently, the post injection cation resides on A and is likely the site of regeneration where access by the mediator is still possible due to the lower surface coverage of Os relative to A (∼7 : 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although we do not fully understand the reason for greater J sc values of stepwise co-sensitization, we assume that this may be due to cascade electron transfer from BD to N719 to titania since BD has higher LUMO energy level (À3.7 eV) than that of N719 (À3.9 eV). 47,48 Fig. 7 J-V characteristics of DSCs containing BD, N719 and cosensitized N719 + BD solar cells.…”
Section: Photovoltaic Performancementioning
confidence: 99%