21st Annual BACUS Symposium on Photomask Technology 2002
DOI: 10.1117/12.458342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Endpoint solution for photomask chrome loads down to 0.25%

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Three endpoint systems were used: a standard monochromator-based optical emission endpoint system, the High Optical Throughput (HOTTM) detectors, and a CCD camera fill-spectrum endpoint system that is capable oftaking full spectrum data at rates greater than 1 Hz. [2] The monochromatorwas used to monitor either single or multiple spectral lines at a given time during the etch. The HOT detector uses a filter that collects signal from a single line.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three endpoint systems were used: a standard monochromator-based optical emission endpoint system, the High Optical Throughput (HOTTM) detectors, and a CCD camera fill-spectrum endpoint system that is capable oftaking full spectrum data at rates greater than 1 Hz. [2] The monochromatorwas used to monitor either single or multiple spectral lines at a given time during the etch. The HOT detector uses a filter that collects signal from a single line.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is due to the etch of the ARC layer. The signal is lower during the etch of the ARC layer than in the etch of the metallic Cr layer since the Cr concentration in the ARC layer is lower [2]. After the endpoint is reached (at the crosses in Figure 6) The consistency in the endpoint trace shape is certainly a measure of the consistency in tool performance.…”
Section: Endpoint Timementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Each mask was measured at 25 data points on the masks in a 5 × 5 square pattern as sketched in Figure 4. Each point is 34 mm from adjacent points, providing a whole field of measurement that is (4 × 34 = 136 mm) 2 The etch results with two different chambers at different times over a period of one month are compared. The setup of both tools assumes the ARC (Anti-Reflective Coating) layer of the masks to be 50 nm thick.…”
Section: Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cr sidewall profile angle dependence on the overetch time was reported. [12] When overetch is too short, the profile angle is too low, mostly due to the footing not removed completely. But the overetch time cannot be set too long because it may introduce other systematic errors such as radial CD distribution.…”
Section: Sidewall Profilesmentioning
confidence: 98%