1994
DOI: 10.1016/0378-4347(94)00068-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enantioselective gas chromatographic assay with electron-capture detection for amlodipine in biological samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several analytical methods have been reported in the literature for monitoring plasma levels of amlodipine. The techniques used in these methods include HPLC with fluorimetric detection (Tatar and Atmaca, 2001), HPLC with ultraviolet detection (Luska et al, 1997), HPLC with electrochemical detection (Shimooka et al, 1989;Josefsson et al, 1995), high-performance thinlayer chromatography-densitometry (Pandya et al, 1995) and gas chromatography (GC) with electron capture detection (Scharpf et al, 1994;Monkman et al, 1996). The reported HPLC methods require laborious extraction procedures like liquid-liquid extraction or solid-phase extraction involving drying and reconstitution, long run-time, high quantification limit, low recovery and large plasma volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several analytical methods have been reported in the literature for monitoring plasma levels of amlodipine. The techniques used in these methods include HPLC with fluorimetric detection (Tatar and Atmaca, 2001), HPLC with ultraviolet detection (Luska et al, 1997), HPLC with electrochemical detection (Shimooka et al, 1989;Josefsson et al, 1995), high-performance thinlayer chromatography-densitometry (Pandya et al, 1995) and gas chromatography (GC) with electron capture detection (Scharpf et al, 1994;Monkman et al, 1996). The reported HPLC methods require laborious extraction procedures like liquid-liquid extraction or solid-phase extraction involving drying and reconstitution, long run-time, high quantification limit, low recovery and large plasma volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calcium channel blockers have been determined by a variety of analytical techniques, such as HPLC [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], HPTLC [11][12][13][14][15][16], gas chromatography [17][18][19][20][21], Micellar electrokinetic chromatography [22][23][24][25], electroanalytical methods [26][27][28] and spectrophotometric methods [29][30][31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Amlodipine Besylate (Adb)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivity of published HPLC-UV methods due to low absorbance of the drug is inadequate for pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring [1,2]. In described gas chromatographic (GC) methods involving capillary column and electron capture detection although the sensitivity is improved, however, thermal decomposition of the drug under GC condition is the major problem [3][4][5]. Although determination of amlodipine in nanogram level was achieved by published HPLC-EC methods [6][7][8], however, they limited by low recovery [6], long retention time of the drug and internal standard (I.S.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%