2015
DOI: 10.1108/ijoa-07-2014-0789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Enacting change through borrowed legitimacy: an institutional perspective

Abstract: The notion of enacting change in lieu of the forces that promote institutionalization is troublesome to Institutional Theory, which generally predicts isomorphism as a condition of survival. Here, we offer borrowed legitimacy through coalitions as an explanation for how an organization might successfully deviate from social norms to enact change, yet still gain sufficient cognitive and sociopolitical legitimacy for survival. We explain that borrowing legitimacy through a coalition allows an illegitimate organi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An example of a study in which the institutional theory provided a framework to study how organizations may influence the institutional environment is the study of Mattingly and Westover (2015). They examined how borrowed legitimacy in a coalition can contribute to the legitimacy of the reference organization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of a study in which the institutional theory provided a framework to study how organizations may influence the institutional environment is the study of Mattingly and Westover (2015). They examined how borrowed legitimacy in a coalition can contribute to the legitimacy of the reference organization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the symbolic viewpoint, organizations use signing the PRI to portray themselves as consistent with social values and expectations. Being labeled as “PRI signatories,” the signed institutional investors can “borrow legitimacy” (Mattingly & Westover, 2015) from the PRI, which is backed by a globally well‐known organization in environmental protection, the United Nations (Bernstein, 2004). Consistently, Majoch et al (2017) indicated that institutional investors' motivation to sign lies in the PRI's organizational legitimacy .…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One crucial aspect of organizational culture emphasises safety culture; integrated safety culture and an intelligent organizational system can develop an evolutionary approach to new safe organizations (Gotcheva et al , 2013). Organizational legitimacy has received the researchers’ interest to align the organization in the context of a social system; an organization can become legitimate by establishing a coalition with another legitimate organization (Mattingly and Westover, 2015). Critical thinking skills influence an organization’s learning culture.…”
Section: Thematic Cluster Analysis and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%