2022
DOI: 10.1108/ijoa-10-2021-2990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International journal of organizational analysis: a bibliometric review (2005–2020)

Abstract: Purpose The International Journal of Organizational Analysis (IJOA) is a leading journal that has published high-quality research focused on various facets of organizational analysis since 1993. This paper aims to conduct a retrospective analysis of the IJOA journey from 2005 to 2020. Design/methodology/approach The data used in this study was extracted using the Scopus database. The bibliometric analysis, using several indicators, is adopted to reveal the major trends and themes of the journal. The mapping … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 208 publications
(239 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They may help with literature reviews by directing the researcher to the most significant publications and mapping the research topics ( Zupi c and Cater, 2015). The bibliometric analyses of a specific journal were conducted in different study fields through the data from the Scopus database (see, for example, Baker et al, 2021;Donthu et al, 2020;Hassan et al, 2021;Kataria et al, 2021;Kumar et al, 2021a;Mukherjee et al, 2021;Tabash et al, 2022) and the WoS database (see, for example, Vogel and Hattke, 2022;Mas-Verdu et al, 2021;Tang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They may help with literature reviews by directing the researcher to the most significant publications and mapping the research topics ( Zupi c and Cater, 2015). The bibliometric analyses of a specific journal were conducted in different study fields through the data from the Scopus database (see, for example, Baker et al, 2021;Donthu et al, 2020;Hassan et al, 2021;Kataria et al, 2021;Kumar et al, 2021a;Mukherjee et al, 2021;Tabash et al, 2022) and the WoS database (see, for example, Vogel and Hattke, 2022;Mas-Verdu et al, 2021;Tang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2021a; Mukherjee et al. , 2021; Tabash et al. , 2022) and the WoS database (see, for example, Vogel and Hattke, 2022; Mas-Verdu et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%