2010
DOI: 10.1002/hrm.20339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Employee satisfaction with meetings: A contemporary facet of job satisfaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
183
2
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(189 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(61 reference statements)
3
183
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, we explicitly emphasized that there were no right or wrong answers (Mäkelä & Brewster, 2009), and third, we guaranteed anonymity (Podsakoff et al 2003;Rogelberg, Allen, Shanock, Scott & Shuffler, 2010). After data collection, we performed a statistical single factor test to evaluate whether common method bias was a problem in our dataset.…”
Section: Controlling For Common Methods Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, we explicitly emphasized that there were no right or wrong answers (Mäkelä & Brewster, 2009), and third, we guaranteed anonymity (Podsakoff et al 2003;Rogelberg, Allen, Shanock, Scott & Shuffler, 2010). After data collection, we performed a statistical single factor test to evaluate whether common method bias was a problem in our dataset.…”
Section: Controlling For Common Methods Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, emergent team roles could affect not only team members' satisfaction with their meetings but also the meeting outcome. Important goals of meetings in organizations include information sharing, idea generation, and decision making (e.g., Kauffeld & Lehmann-Wilenbrock, 2012;Rogelberg, Allen, Shanock, Scott, & Shuffler, 2010;Tracy & Dimock, 2004). Hence, in terms of meeting outcomes, we are particularly interested in the extent to which ideas or solutions are developed in the meeting.…”
Section: A Communicative Approach To Team Role Creationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most accepted and common facets of satisfaction (Judge et al, 2001) are satisfaction with pay, promotion opportunities, coworkers, supervision, and the work itself (Smith et al, 1969). These five job facets typically account for a substantial amount of the variance in overall job satisfaction (Kinicki et al, 2002;Rogelberg et al, 2010).…”
Section: Job Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%