2009
DOI: 10.1021/ci800298z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical Scoring Functions for Advanced Protein−Ligand Docking with PLANTS

Abstract: In this paper we present two empirical scoring functions, PLANTS(CHEMPLP) and PLANTS(PLP), designed for our docking algorithm PLANTS (Protein-Ligand ANT System), which is based on ant colony optimization (ACO). They are related, regarding their functional form, to parts of already published scoring functions and force fields. The parametrization procedure described here was able to identify several parameter settings showing an excellent performance for the task of pose prediction on two test sets comprising 2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
1,087
0
19

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,135 publications
(1,113 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
7
1,087
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…PLANTS1.2, which uses stochastic optimization algorithms called Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) [16] was employed to perform the docking simulations. Structure Protonation and Recognition System (SPORES) software (http://www.tcd.unikonstanz.de/research/spores.php), which assigns atom and bond type according to TRIPOS force field convention [18] was employed to virtually prepare the COX-1 structure as the protein target in the docking simulations using PLANTS.…”
Section: Computation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…PLANTS1.2, which uses stochastic optimization algorithms called Ant Colony Optimization (ACO) [16] was employed to perform the docking simulations. Structure Protonation and Recognition System (SPORES) software (http://www.tcd.unikonstanz.de/research/spores.php), which assigns atom and bond type according to TRIPOS force field convention [18] was employed to virtually prepare the COX-1 structure as the protein target in the docking simulations using PLANTS.…”
Section: Computation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction of SBVS protocol to identify COX-1 inhibitors using PLANTS docking software version 1.2 (PLANTS1.2) [16] is presented in this article. Iterative procedures were employed to optimize the protocol in order to obtain a protocol that can redock the reference ligand accurately compared to the pose of the reference crystal structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Open Babel version 2.2.3 (www.openbabel.org), employing Monte Carlo search with a force field of MMFF94 was used to virtually prepare the EFGR protein target and ligand, together with Structure Protonation and Recognition System (SPORES) software (www.tcd.unikonstanz.de/research/spores.php) [14][15]. Molecular docking simulation was subsequently performed by PLANTS1.2 [16].…”
Section: Computation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 phenol (ZM-241385) was redocked into the crystal structure of the hA 2A AR (PDB code: 3EML) with different docking algorithms and scoring functions, as already described. 29,46 Then, rmsd values between predicted and crystallographic positions of ZM-241385 were calculated for each of the docking algorithms.…”
Section: Journal Of Medicinal Chemistrymentioning
confidence: 99%