2007
DOI: 10.1007/bf03192543
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Empirical research in CSCW — a review of the ACM/CSCW conferences from 1998 to 2004

Abstract: This paper reviews all the 169

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most notable in Software Engineering [8,9] and Computer-supported cooperative work [10,11]. Zelkowitz [8] identifies different forms of validation that can be found in the area of Software engineering and investigates the use of these different forms of validation in the Software Engineering literature in a quantitative study.…”
Section: Empirical Studies Of Experimental Research In Computer Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most notable in Software Engineering [8,9] and Computer-supported cooperative work [10,11]. Zelkowitz [8] identifies different forms of validation that can be found in the area of Software engineering and investigates the use of these different forms of validation in the Software Engineering literature in a quantitative study.…”
Section: Empirical Studies Of Experimental Research In Computer Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, only 30% of the papers used controlled experiments in a laboratory setting. Wainer and Barsottini performed a follow-up study on papers submitted to the ACM CSCW conference over a period of six years [11]. They found out that while overall the amount of experimental work has not increased, there was a significant increase in papers that performed an evaluation in terms of field experiments.…”
Section: Empirical Studies Of Experimental Research In Computer Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our methodology 106:2 James R. Wallace, Saba Oji, and Craig Anslow builds on two previous reviews [26,30] to classify the type of research conducted, and the methodologies used by CSCW researchers. Given the introduction and rise of social networking and novel devices such as smartphones, tablets, and wearables, we also extended their analyses to understand how research has responded to these technological trends across the same period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5] [6]). In these surveys, authors propose (usually based on the literature) criteria to classify and discuss existing collaborative methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%