Emotional sharing and the extended mind

Felipe, León; Szanto, Thomas; Zahavi, Dan

doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1351-x

Cited by 54 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…de Vignemont (2009). 2 See Zahavi (2014Zahavi ( , 2015aZahavi ( , 2018, León and Zahavi (2016), Szanto (2015), Moran (2015, 2016); cf. also Vendrell Ferran (2015), Svenaeus (2016Svenaeus ( , 2018.…”

Section: Research Background and Future Avenuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction: Empathy, Shared Emotions, and Social Identity

Szanto

Krueger

2019

Topoi

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Research Background and Future Avenuesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Introduction: Empathy, Shared Emotions, and Social Identity

Szanto

Krueger

2019

Topoi

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, much work remains to be done in systematically linking debates within philosophy on socially extended and collective emotions (León et al 2017). One particularly interesting aspect is the question what attracts people to one another in play and why we play together.…”

Section: Theoretical Aspects In a World Of Practicesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Why so Serious? Theorising Playful Model-Driven Group Decision Support with Situated Affectivity

2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

An integrative approach to theorising behavioural, affective and cognitive processes in model-driven group decision support (GDS) interventions is needed to gain insight into the (micro-)processes by which outcomes are accomplished. This paper proposes that the theoretical lens of situated affectivity, grounded in recent extensions of scaffolded mind models, is suitable to understand the performativity of affective micro-processes in model-driven GDS interventions. An illustrative vignette of a humorous micro-moment in a group decision workshop is presented to reveal the performativity of extended affective scaffolding processes for group decision development. The lens of situated affectivity constitutes a novel approach for the study of interventionist practice in the context of group decision making (and negotiation). An outlook with opportunities for future research is offered to facilitate an integrated approach to the study of cognitive-affective and behavioural micro-processes in model-driven GDS interventions.

show abstract

“…Following León et al (2017), I suggest that an account of affective sharing needs to fulfill the plurality and the integration requirements. Whereas the integration requirement implies that we experience a shared emotion as our experience, the plurality requirement indicates that more than one individual is part of that experience, and that the participants are aware of such a plurality.…”

Section: Plurality Conditionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Shared emotions: a Steinian proposal

Thonhauser

2018

Phenom Cogn Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this paper is to clarify the notion of shared emotion. After contextualizing this notion within the broader research landscape on collective affective intentionality, I suggest that we reserve the term shared emotion to an affective experience that is phenomenologically and functionally ours: we experience it together as our emotion, and it is also constitutively not mine and yours, but ours. I focus on the three approaches that have dominated the philosophical discussion on shared emotions: cognitivist accounts, concern-based accounts, and phenomenological fusion accounts. After identifying strengths and weaknesses of these approaches and summarizing the elements that a multifaceted theory of shared emotions requires, I turn to the work of the early phenomenologist Edith Stein to further advance an approach to shared emotions that combines the main strengths of Helm and Salmela's concern-based accounts and Schmid's phenomenological fusion account. According to this proposal, the sharedness of a shared emotion cannot be located in one element, but rather consists in a complex of interrelated features.Keywords Shared emotions . Collective emotions . Affective intentionality . Communal experience . Edith Stein The last decade has seen an emerging debate about the possibility and nature of shared or collective emotions.1 As yet, however, there has been no agreement over precisely what these labels refer to. The aim of this paper is to clarify the notion of shared emotions. Following a preliminary definition, which contextualizes the debate on shared emotions within the broader research landscape on collective affective intentionality, I will discuss three major approaches to shared emotions in contemporary philosophical debate. After identifying shortcomings in these approaches and summarizing the elements that need to be accounted for in a multifaceted theory of shared emotions, I will turn to Edith Stein to introduce several suggestions from early phenomenology that can improve current theorizing on shared emotions.

show abstract

Emotional sharing and the extended mind

Cited by 54 publications

References 71 publications

Introduction: Empathy, Shared Emotions, and Social Identity

Introduction: Empathy, Shared Emotions, and Social Identity

Why so Serious? Theorising Playful Model-Driven Group Decision Support with Situated Affectivity

Shared emotions: a Steinian proposal

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About