2020
DOI: 10.31234/osf.io/qkxvb
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emotional responses to prosocial messages increase willingness to self-isolate during the COVID-19 pandemic

Abstract:

The COVID-19 pandemic may be one of the greatest modern societal challenges that requires widespread collective action and cooperation. While a handful of actions can help reduce pathogen transmission, one critical behavior is to self-isolate. Public health messages often use persuasive language to change attitudes and behaviors, which can evoke a wide range of negative and positive emotional responses. In a U.S. representative sample (N = 955), we presented two messages that leveraged either threatening or… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
67
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…health communications about social distancing should incorporate more nuanced guidelines for safely engaging socially with others, while also maintaining appropriate physical distancing standards, using non-blaming and non-stigmatizing language and targeting specific groups such as men and younger individuals. In line with our findings that wanting to protect self, others and the community were the strongest motivators associated with higher adherence to social distancing recommendations, it is important that these compassionate-focused and prosocial attitudes are kept at the center of future public health campaigns about social distancing [20][21][22]. Lastly, the study found that seeing many people walking in the streets was one of the strongest barriers against social distancing (i.e., associated with lower adherence), but seeing few people in the streets acted as a facilitator of adherence to social distancing (statistic not reported).…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…health communications about social distancing should incorporate more nuanced guidelines for safely engaging socially with others, while also maintaining appropriate physical distancing standards, using non-blaming and non-stigmatizing language and targeting specific groups such as men and younger individuals. In line with our findings that wanting to protect self, others and the community were the strongest motivators associated with higher adherence to social distancing recommendations, it is important that these compassionate-focused and prosocial attitudes are kept at the center of future public health campaigns about social distancing [20][21][22]. Lastly, the study found that seeing many people walking in the streets was one of the strongest barriers against social distancing (i.e., associated with lower adherence), but seeing few people in the streets acted as a facilitator of adherence to social distancing (statistic not reported).…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Nevertheless, positive emotions can also play important roles. For example, Heffner et al [ 34 ] found that emotionally positive messages (prosocial messages) can increase the likelihood that people self-isolate. In addition, we focused on the roles played by affect and emotion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The virtue of manipulating the wording of instructions lies in its simplicity and general versatility. In addition to highlighting self-identity, a recent paper reported that manipulating the expressions of messages to appeal to citizens' emotions is effective in promoting behaviour to self-isolate [2]. However, it is important to find more useful methods, given the circumstances in different countries such as cultural, linguistic and legal differences.…”
Section: Background and Main Research Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned in the Participants section, we excluded the participants whose answers for the questions about native language and nationality are not Japanese and Japan, respectively. 2 Figure 1. The timeline of the survey schedule for sending the form for the second wave.…”
Section: Data Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%