SAE Technical Paper Series 1994
DOI: 10.4271/942261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emissions from Methanol, Ethanol, and Diesel Powered Urban Transit Buses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As opposed to the promising benefits in the emissions of regulated compounds and CO 2 , an increase in the ethanol concentration in a fuel blend led to higher emissions of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde [7,11,12,15]. These carbonyl compounds are highly toxic and potentially carcinogenic [16][17][18]. They are also known for their impact on air quality, as they are precursors of ozone and peroxyacetyl nitrates (PAN) [15,[19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As opposed to the promising benefits in the emissions of regulated compounds and CO 2 , an increase in the ethanol concentration in a fuel blend led to higher emissions of formaldehyde and acetaldehyde [7,11,12,15]. These carbonyl compounds are highly toxic and potentially carcinogenic [16][17][18]. They are also known for their impact on air quality, as they are precursors of ozone and peroxyacetyl nitrates (PAN) [15,[19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…According to Corkwell [8], who reviewed the existing published data from previous exhaust emissions testing on ethanol-diesel blends, the most frequent observations occurred around a 20% increase in the level of THC emission, a 20% reduction or no change in CO emission and almost no variation in NOx emission. Besides the regulated exhaust emissions, ethanol-diesel fuel blends could increase the emission of unburned hydrocarbons [9] and aldehyde emission [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The blends containing 83-94% diesel fuel, 5-15% ethanol, 1-3% additive and a small amount of commercially available cetane improver (o0.33% by volume) in the mixture could reduce 41% PM, 27% CO emissions from a heavy-duty diesel engine in laboratory and field tests (Ahmed, 2001). However, ethanol diesel blends increase unburned hydrocarbons (Shih, 1998;Cole et al, 2001), NO x emissions (Cole et al, 2001) and aldehyde emissions (Rideout et al, 1994;Gjirja et al, 1998). Moreover, the viscosity and lubricity of the blends decreases, cetane number linearly reduces at ambient temperature (Caro et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%