Abstract:This article explores the relationship between emergent biliteracy and growing up in a biliterate environment. The study focuses on two questions: (1) What knowledge of biliteracy do young bilingual preschool children develop in the early years? (2) How do context and specific language environments influence the development of biliteracy in young Mexican Spanish‐English bilingual children? The authors report data from a multiple‐method research project with 12 4‐ and 5‐year‐old Mexican immigrant children livin… Show more
“…Among the limited intervention research on storybook reading with ELs, findings have shown contributions of the frequency of home reading (Collins, 2010) and the utility of reading in the L1 or L2 to L2 vocabulary learning (Roberts, 2008). Descriptive studies have shown that storybook reading is common, that storybook reading takes place in primary and second languages (Reyes & Azuara, 2008), and that discussion aids comprehension (Iddings, Risko, & Rampulla, 2009). Less is known about the amounts of talk and interaction that are optimal for learning (Hammett, van Kleeck, & Huberty, 2003), how the demand of talk (Danis et al, 2000) affects comprehension, and how child and family variables interact in monolinguals or ELs.…”
Research Findings: This study examines the effects of low-and highcognitive demand discussion on children's story comprehension and identifies contributions of discussion, initial vocabularies, and parent reading involvement. A total of 70 English learner preschoolers took baseline vocabulary tests in Portuguese and English, were randomly assigned to experimental or control conditions, and were read pairs of books in small groups. In the experimental condition, 1 book per pair was discussed using lowcognitive demand (literal) talk. The other was discussed using high-cognitive demand (inferential) talk. In the control condition, books were read aloud without discussion. All children took story comprehension tests (new literal and inferential questions) following books' third readings. Findings showed significant effects of discussion on comprehension. Repeated measures analyses indicated significant effects of high-demand discussion on both question types, particularly inferential questions. Regression indicated significant contributions of high-demand discussion beyond English vocabulary and home reading. Practice or Policy: High-demand discussion significantly influences children's inferential thinking skill, contributes benefits over and above expected impacts of initial vocabulary, and may offer benefits over low-demand talk for literal details. Teachers need not wait to engage young language learners in cognitively challenging discussion.
“…Among the limited intervention research on storybook reading with ELs, findings have shown contributions of the frequency of home reading (Collins, 2010) and the utility of reading in the L1 or L2 to L2 vocabulary learning (Roberts, 2008). Descriptive studies have shown that storybook reading is common, that storybook reading takes place in primary and second languages (Reyes & Azuara, 2008), and that discussion aids comprehension (Iddings, Risko, & Rampulla, 2009). Less is known about the amounts of talk and interaction that are optimal for learning (Hammett, van Kleeck, & Huberty, 2003), how the demand of talk (Danis et al, 2000) affects comprehension, and how child and family variables interact in monolinguals or ELs.…”
Research Findings: This study examines the effects of low-and highcognitive demand discussion on children's story comprehension and identifies contributions of discussion, initial vocabularies, and parent reading involvement. A total of 70 English learner preschoolers took baseline vocabulary tests in Portuguese and English, were randomly assigned to experimental or control conditions, and were read pairs of books in small groups. In the experimental condition, 1 book per pair was discussed using lowcognitive demand (literal) talk. The other was discussed using high-cognitive demand (inferential) talk. In the control condition, books were read aloud without discussion. All children took story comprehension tests (new literal and inferential questions) following books' third readings. Findings showed significant effects of discussion on comprehension. Repeated measures analyses indicated significant effects of high-demand discussion on both question types, particularly inferential questions. Regression indicated significant contributions of high-demand discussion beyond English vocabulary and home reading. Practice or Policy: High-demand discussion significantly influences children's inferential thinking skill, contributes benefits over and above expected impacts of initial vocabulary, and may offer benefits over low-demand talk for literal details. Teachers need not wait to engage young language learners in cognitively challenging discussion.
“…This environmental print can facilitate early writing and reading by providing early success and exemplars for copying (Reyes & Azuara, 2008). Recognising this, teachers seek out or create signs that provide language input for their students.…”
Section: Sign-making Practices In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…biliteracy), Reyes and Azuara (2008) examine the relationship between this emerging biliteracy and one's environment, as bilingual children negotiate two languages in the different contexts of home, school and neighbourhood. In some cases, children see signage in their home language in their neighbourhood, but not at school (Moore, 2010), but where the bilingualism is a goal of the classroom, teachers purposefully provide environmental print in both languages (Brown, 2012).…”
Section: Sign-making Practices In Schoolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teachers create signs that add to the language input they provide through instruction (Brown, 2012;Morgan, 2004) and administrators place signs as part of their marketing to the general public (Eaton, 2005). Sign-making practices provide environmental print seen by students (Giles & Tunks, 2010;Prior, 2009;Reyes & Azuara, 2008). While bilingual signs would serve the purpose of promoting bilingualism, a nexus analysis of sign making in this programme sheds light on practices that compartmentalise sign making according to the responsibilities of the sign maker and impede the reach of the Bilingual Program.…”
This study is an examination of signage and sign-making practices in one elementary (Kindergarten to sixth grade) public school which offers a German Bilingual Program (GBP) for the development of German-English bilingualism. Schools are public spaces in which the visible language choice on signs reveals the circulating discourses around language status. Surprisingly, little is known about the creation of these signs and the decision-making behind their creation. This linguistic landscape is analysed using nexus analysis which sheds light on the convergence of (1) the historical body of social actors in which teachers are primarily responsible for sign making, (2) an interaction order in which teachers practise organic sign placement and (3) discourses in place which include the promotion of bilingualism. This research reveals that signage is limited in its promotion of German-English bilingualism, constrained strongly by practices that define sign maker's responsibility and the GBP's reach. This study contributes to our understanding of linguistic landscape research by exploring the degree to which a school offering a Bilingual Program promotes bilingualism through signage. Educators and researchers looking critically at school signs are given cause to question accepted practices and strong discourses which limit the promotion of bilingualism.
“…In this section, I review studies that take a sociocultural approach in describing how families and communities affect biliteracy by emphasizing different aspects or factors that impact the process. Although the studies vary in terms of methodology, many of them involve single case studies with natural observations and descriptions of an individual child's biliteracy development (e.g., Bauer & Mkhize, 2012;Buckwalter & Lo, 2002) or observations of a smaller set of children who were part of a larger research project (Drury, 2004;Gregory et al, 2004;I. Reyes & Azuara, 2008;Yaden & Tsai, 2012).…”
Section: Biliteracy In Community and Family Contextsmentioning
The dual purposes of this review are, first, to synthesize the extant research on biliteracy, focusing particularly on children and youths and, second, to clarify key terms and phenomena in this developing field. The review is organized into three areas of research: (1) individual biliteracy development, (2) biliteracy in family and community contexts, and (3) biliteracy in the classroom context. Contributions from these various areas offer multiple possibilities for describing children's −development and maintenance of biliteracy while taking into consideration the interdisciplinary and multifaceted nature of research in this area.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.