1993
DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90480-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergence of novel strain of Vibrio cholerae with epidemic potential in southern and eastern India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

9
290
1
3

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 512 publications
(303 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
9
290
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…V. cholerae O1 is the causative agent of pandemic cholera. V cholerae O139 (the Bengal strain) was reported as another cause of cholera (Ramamurthy et al 1993). The epidemic causing strains of V. cholerae (O1 or O139 serogroups) produce cholera toxin (CT) which is the major contributing factor for profuse diarrohea (cholera gravis) characterized by severe diarrohea with rice water stools, devastating dehydration and electrolyte imbalance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V. cholerae O1 is the causative agent of pandemic cholera. V cholerae O139 (the Bengal strain) was reported as another cause of cholera (Ramamurthy et al 1993). The epidemic causing strains of V. cholerae (O1 or O139 serogroups) produce cholera toxin (CT) which is the major contributing factor for profuse diarrohea (cholera gravis) characterized by severe diarrohea with rice water stools, devastating dehydration and electrolyte imbalance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…V. cholerae O1 biotype ET, which was first reported in 1905 (Politzer, 1959) initiated the seventh cholera pandemic in the early 1960s by displacing the CL biotype (Kaper et al, 1995). In 1992, a V. cholerae non-O1 serovar, designated V. cholerae O139 synonym Bengal, appeared as the cause of epidemic cholera in Bangladesh (Cholera Working Group, 1993) and India (Ramamurthy et al, 1993). V. cholerae O139 Bengal emerged by displacing V. cholerae O1 ET, an occurrence that was considered to be significant in the history of cholera.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In October 1992, a new serogroup, defined O139, caused a severe outbreak of cholera in southeast India. Within 10 months, the O139 serogroup was disseminated all over the Indian subcontinent and soon thereafter spread to 11 neighboring countries, temporarily displacing the O1 serogroups (64). Since then both serogroups coexist and are responsible for large outbreaks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%