2016
DOI: 10.1007/s40732-016-0177-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergence of Intraverbals with Antonyms Derived From Relations with Verbal and Nonverbal Stimuli

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no point-by-point correspondence between this stimulus and response and they are maintained by generalized conditioned reinforcement (such as social attention). These may occur as an exchange between speakers or as part of a verbal chain [34,45,47], and can be taught either directly [48,49] or indirectly [50][51][52][53][54][55]. For a general review of intraverbal research consult the work of Aguirre et al [56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no point-by-point correspondence between this stimulus and response and they are maintained by generalized conditioned reinforcement (such as social attention). These may occur as an exchange between speakers or as part of a verbal chain [34,45,47], and can be taught either directly [48,49] or indirectly [50][51][52][53][54][55]. For a general review of intraverbal research consult the work of Aguirre et al [56].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two experiments (10.0%; Carnerero & Pérez‐González, 2015; Carnerero et al., 2019) investigated stimulus pairing to generate intraverbals. Perez‐Gonzalez and Garcia‐Asenjo (2016) used a combination of procedures (5.0%), including selection‐based and tact training to facilitate emergent intraverbals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies evaluated the effects of instructional variations; for example, Zaring-Hinkle, Carp, and Lepper (2016) found that for college students, a one-to-many intraverbal training structure yielded more novel intraverbal responses than a linear series training structure, mirroring findings on stimulus equivalence (e.g., Arntzen, 2012). Yet others evaluated behavioral prerequisites for emergent stimulus control, such as how emergent intraverbal control is influenced by existing relations between nonverbal stimuli (Pérez-González & García-Asenjo, 2016) or existing intraverbal responses to elements of test questions (Belloso-Díaz & Pérez-González, 2015; Carp & Petursdottir, 2012).…”
Section: Emergent Mands Tacts Intraverbals and Listener Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%