Organic Computing — A Paradigm Shift for Complex Systems 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-0130-0_44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergence in Action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon has been shown to matter for commitment because some identifications are more appropriate than others for maintaining the action, or for the emergence of new actions. For commitment to induce a significant change in behavior, preliminary behavior and target behavior should share the same level of action identification, see e.g., Joule and Beauvois (1998);Wegner, Vallacher, Macomber, Wood, and Arps (1984). Commitment binds the person to a behavioral act, but it must also belong to the same category of identification.…”
Section: Why the Oath (Sometimes) Work: Evidence From Decision Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon has been shown to matter for commitment because some identifications are more appropriate than others for maintaining the action, or for the emergence of new actions. For commitment to induce a significant change in behavior, preliminary behavior and target behavior should share the same level of action identification, see e.g., Joule and Beauvois (1998);Wegner, Vallacher, Macomber, Wood, and Arps (1984). Commitment binds the person to a behavioral act, but it must also belong to the same category of identification.…”
Section: Why the Oath (Sometimes) Work: Evidence From Decision Timesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion that behavior can be represented at different levels has been acknowledged by several models and theories dealing with the cognitive architecture and control of behavior (e.g., Aarts & Dijksterhuis, ; Gallistel, ; Jeannerod, ; Powers, ; Vallacher & Wegner, ). For instance, behavior representation levels play an important role in the understanding of behavior (Aarts & Hassin, ; Kozak, Marsh, & Wegner, ; Vallacher & Wegner, ; Wegner, Vallacher, Macomber, Wood, & Arps, ). Importantly, the level at which people represent their behavior has also been suggested to play an important role in the matching process underlying experiences of self‐agency (Pacherie, ).…”
Section: Behavior Representations and Inferences Of Self‐agencymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7-10) distingue des stratégies de parole destinées à se démarquer des adversaires et reposant sur une « logique symbolique », exaltant les valeurs, et sur une « logique pragmatique », affirmant la crédibilité. Nous sommes tentés de rapprocher ces « logiques » de la théorie psychosociale de l'identification de l'action (Wegner, Vallacher, Macomber, Wood & Arps, 1984). Cette théorie rend compte du fait que les gens peuvent identifier une même action à des niveaux variables, du plus concret au plus abstrait, du plus particulier au plus général.…”
Section: Douze Travaux Trois Posturesunclassified