1974
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-24-4-534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emended Descriptions of the Genus Alcaligenes and of Alcaligenes faecalis and Proposal That the Generic Name Achromobacter be Rejected: Status of the Named Species of Alcaligenes and Achromobacter: Request for an Opinion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since strains in cluster 2 seemed to be related to Alcaligenes species, we examined the quinone system and cellular fatty acid composition of Alcaligenes faecalis KS 0303 and Alcaligenes paradoxus KS 0304. Furthermore, we included Achromobacter xylosoxidans KS 0305 because this species is closely related to Alcaligenes species (77,78). The ubiquinone system (Q-8) in these three strains was confirmed, and this quinone system was the same as those in the strains in cluster 2.…”
Section: Grouping Of Strains Of Species In the Flavobacteruim-cytophamentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Since strains in cluster 2 seemed to be related to Alcaligenes species, we examined the quinone system and cellular fatty acid composition of Alcaligenes faecalis KS 0303 and Alcaligenes paradoxus KS 0304. Furthermore, we included Achromobacter xylosoxidans KS 0305 because this species is closely related to Alcaligenes species (77,78). The ubiquinone system (Q-8) in these three strains was confirmed, and this quinone system was the same as those in the strains in cluster 2.…”
Section: Grouping Of Strains Of Species In the Flavobacteruim-cytophamentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Among others, A. faecalis seemed very similar, though the GC content (58.9 %) reported by HOLDING and SHEWAN (51) was smaller than 64.6 % in the strain 6-3. As to the utilization of many carbon compounds and the urease reaction of A, faecalis, there is no detailed information, except for those by HENDRIE, HOLDING, and SHEWAN (52). COUN (5S) and BOARD (59) had stated that this microorganism could not utilize urea, while RHODES (60) identified an aniline-utilizing strain of A. faecalis which hydrolyzed urea and starch, and had a GC content of 67.3 %.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been much confusion in the classification of these bacteria. Ill-definition of the genus and the species, inadequateness of the methods employed and lacking of type strain have been referred to (1)(2)(3)(4). It is often difficult to identify isolates according to the present scheme.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%