Elite Ideology and Risk Perception in Nuclear Energy Policy

Abstract

Changing U.S. attitudes toward new technologies are examined, as are explanations of such changes. We hypothesize that increased concern with the risks of new technologies by certain elite groups is partly a surrogate for underlying ideological criticisms of U.S. society. The question of risk is examined within the framework of the debate over nuclear energy. Studies of various leadership groups are used to demonstrate the ideological component of risk assessment. Studies of scientists' and journalists' attitudes, media coverage of nuclear energy, and public perception of scientists' views suggest both that journalists' ideologies influence their coverage of nuclear energy and that media coverage of the issue is partly responsible for public misperceptions of the views of scientists. We conclude with a discussion of the historical development of the environmental movement in the 1960s and 1970s and the relation of this movement to the public's declining support for nuclear energy.

The effects of the Fukushima disaster on nuclear energy debates and policies: a two-step comparative examination

“…governments' pro-nuclear positions are in line with previous scholarship that suggests that both political elites and the general public who hold right-of-centre views take a more pronuclear energy stance (Kuklinski et al 1982;Rothman and Lichter 1987;Plutzer et al 1998).…”

Weather, Climate, and Worldviews: The Sources and Consequences of Public Perceptions of Changes in Local Weather Patterns*

“…Issues that have a bearing on deeply held societal norms and consequential public policies might become entangled with preferences about the role of government in society. The assertion that the climate is changing as a result of human activities, and that addressing it will require a substantial intervention by governments into the otherwise private affairs of individuals and businesses, will have a substantial ideological valence (Rothman and Lichter 1987;Douglas and Wildavsky 1982;Leiserowitz 2005). A large body of research has confirmed that political ideology plays a substantial role in shaping perceptions of climate change, with conservatives (and, more recently, the ''Tea Party'') tending to perceive climate to be stable and benign, and therefore requiring little or no government intervention (Leiserowitz et al 2011;McCright and Dunlap 2011;Weber and Stern 2011;Krosnick et al 2006;Dietz et al 2007;Dunlap and McCright 2008).…”

Improving Quarantine Risk Communication: Understanding Public Risk Perceptions

“…Some claim that scientists are immune from ideological bias and that risk assessments merely reflect a dispassionate distillation of current scientific knowledge (Rothman, 1994;Rothman & Lichter, 1987). However, the longstanding consensus is that both scientific elites and issue publics (e.g., journalists) show greater evidence of ideological thinking than samples of the mass public (e.g., Converse, 1964;Feldman, 1989;McAllister, 1991).…”