2004
DOI: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500356
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated personal exposure to particulate matter from human activities in a residence

Abstract: Continuous laser particle counters collocated with time-integrated filter samplers were used to measure personal, indoor, and outdoor particulate matter (PM) concentrations for a variety of prescribed human activities during a 5-day experimental period in a home in Redwood City, CA, USA. The mean daytime personal exposures to PM 2.5 and PM 5 during prescribed activities were 6 and 17 times, respectively, as high as the pre-activity indoor background concentration. Activities that resulted in the highest exposu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
112
2
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
11
112
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It suggested that a large amount of electronic products containing PBDEs, such as computers, printers, and other electrical appliances, flooded the indoor environments in non-e-waste recycling zones. Moreover, Ferro et al 36 noticed that personal exposure (i.e., participants carrying sampling devices) to particulate matter was 1.4−1.6 times higher than that obtained by a stationary area monitor. Allen et al 35 also indicated that personal inhalation exposure to indoor air PBDEs was approximately 1−4 times higher than that by a stationary area monitor.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It suggested that a large amount of electronic products containing PBDEs, such as computers, printers, and other electrical appliances, flooded the indoor environments in non-e-waste recycling zones. Moreover, Ferro et al 36 noticed that personal exposure (i.e., participants carrying sampling devices) to particulate matter was 1.4−1.6 times higher than that obtained by a stationary area monitor. Allen et al 35 also indicated that personal inhalation exposure to indoor air PBDEs was approximately 1−4 times higher than that by a stationary area monitor.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the scenario presented in this study, respiration was found not to be a major route, although further in-house measurements of lead in air are needed because gradients may exist, especially from resuspension (Ferro et al, 2004). The data lacking in the model is the actual mass of lead transferred from a hand to the gut, given a certain loading, along with a method to quantify ingestion exposures of children (Cohen Hubal et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exposure to the emissions, in particular to the respirable aerosols stemming from these burning practices is known to cause a large number of health problems (Smith 2000). Various literature sources have acknowledged that ambient pollution levels are not necessarily indicative of the concentrations of air pollution that humans are exposed to on an everyday basis, as most people tend to spend most of their time indoors (Lim et al 2012, Diapouli et al 2011, Ferro et al 2004, Smith 2002 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%