2019
DOI: 10.1007/s40803-019-00126-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elephants in the Room: The European Commission’s 2019 Communication on the Rule of Law

Abstract: This contribution honouring Prof. Martin Krygier scholarship provides a brief critical reading of the European Commission's July 2019 Communication on the Rule of Law (COM(2019) 343 final). It argues that although the Commission's effort is welcome, the Communication fails to correctly identify the core problem related to the Rule of Law in the EU, which is the constitutional capture in the illiberal regimes. The failure to identify the core problem with unequivocal precision and spell out its key elements as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although not conceptualized as a mismatch, scholarly work on the EU's and the Commission's responses to rule of law backsliding has extensively criticized this ‘discursive approach’ (Kochenov and Pech, 2015, p. 532). Scholars are sceptical regarding the Commission's institutional innovations and the capacity of those innovations to reverse backsliding precisely because of their ‘soft’ nature (Kochenov and Pech, 2015, 2016; Blauberger, 2016; Kochenov, 2019; Uitz, 2019). To summarize this criticism, the Commission's strategy ‘is based on the misguided assumption that a discursive approach with would‐be autocrats can work’ (Pech and Kochenov, 2019, p. 3).…”
Section: Management Instead Of Enforcement Of Eu Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not conceptualized as a mismatch, scholarly work on the EU's and the Commission's responses to rule of law backsliding has extensively criticized this ‘discursive approach’ (Kochenov and Pech, 2015, p. 532). Scholars are sceptical regarding the Commission's institutional innovations and the capacity of those innovations to reverse backsliding precisely because of their ‘soft’ nature (Kochenov and Pech, 2015, 2016; Blauberger, 2016; Kochenov, 2019; Uitz, 2019). To summarize this criticism, the Commission's strategy ‘is based on the misguided assumption that a discursive approach with would‐be autocrats can work’ (Pech and Kochenov, 2019, p. 3).…”
Section: Management Instead Of Enforcement Of Eu Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especial preocupación causaban tres asuntos: la independencia del banco central nacional; la independencia de la autoridad de protección de datos, y las medidas relativas al Poder Judicial, que anticipaban drásticamente la edad de jubilación de los jueces a la edad de 62 años 57 . 53 Kochenov (2019): 424. 54 Pérez de Nanclares (2019): 152.…”
Section: La Persuasión Política Y La Interposición De Recursos De Incunclassified
“…20-21; European Commission, A New EU Framework to Strengthen the Rule of Law (2014) (COM(2014)158); European Parliament, Report with Recommendations to the Commission on the Establishment of an EU Mechanism on Democracy, the Rule of Law and Fundamental Rights (2016) (2015/2254(INL)). For a comparison of all these instruments, see , Kochenov and Pech (2016), Oliver and Stefanelli (2016); but see Hirsch , , Kochenov and Pech (2015a); See also Kochenov (2019c).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%