2000
DOI: 10.1021/ac000625f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophoretic Separation of Proteins on a Microchip with Noncovalent, Postcolumn Labeling

Abstract: Proteins were separated by microchip capillary electrophoresis and labeled on-chip by postcolumn addition of a fluorogenic dye, NanoOrange, for detection by laser-induced fluorescence. NanoOrange binds noncovalently with hydrophobic protein regions to form highly fluorescent complexes. Kinetic measurements of complex formation on the microchips suggest that the reaction rate is near the diffusion limit under the conditions used for protein separation. Little or no band broadening is caused by the postcolumn la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
121
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(60 reference statements)
5
121
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The sizing and quantitation data of these milk proteins are shown in Table 2. Except for casein aggregations, the sizing accuracy was within 3.5%, which was regarded as good in ME [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and the quantitation results were also good compared to those of another report [19]. Consequently, these results suggested that our staining method was promising for analysis of real biological proteins.…”
Section: Application Of the Double-staining Methods To The Analysis Ofsupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The sizing and quantitation data of these milk proteins are shown in Table 2. Except for casein aggregations, the sizing accuracy was within 3.5%, which was regarded as good in ME [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] and the quantitation results were also good compared to those of another report [19]. Consequently, these results suggested that our staining method was promising for analysis of real biological proteins.…”
Section: Application Of the Double-staining Methods To The Analysis Ofsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…To enhance the sensitivity, alternatives such as LIF detection instead of UV detection [7], on-line preconcentration [8], porous membrane [9] and a special detection method like refractive index detection [10] have been examined. However, they needed custom-made instruments and were labor intensive, and so have not been put to practical use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard capillary separation techniques were transferred to the microchip format and LIF detection systems for the ultrasensitive detection of labeled proteins were developed. Using LIF detection in the visible (VIS) range, separation of covalently labeled proteins [5,6] and peptides [7,8] as well as postcolumn labeling for protein chip electrophoresis have been demonstrated [9,10]. Recently, a label-free interferometric backscatter method has been described by Wang et al [11], where proteins could be detected in the nM range.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glass microchips were further applied for the separation of fluorescently labeled proteins. Applications comprised the separation of labeled marker proteins with M concentrations and LIF detection (Liu et al, 2000a), an assay for theophylline in the therapeutically useful range (Chiem and Harrison, 1997), as well as a postcolumn labeling method with a mass detection limit of <0.5 pg for model proteins (Liu et al, 2000b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%